They said they didn’t remember or didn’t think it was relevant. Do you think it’s a coincidence that the parts they don’t remember or didn’t think were relevant were also the most humiliating parts of the story?

Hehe. You didnt say ANYTHING.

Is it because English is my second language that I can't make sense of this post? I am not joking. I do not understand the purpose of this post. If someone so kindly explains the general idea to me I will appreciate it.

You’ve missed the point if you think anyone is saying you shouldn’t be concerned about the direction the country is going or that you should be passive. The point is to examine WHY you back a certain candidate for the less overt biases that are inherent in support. And look at who you think is best capable of…

Source?

He was fired because the CBC thought that even the consensual beating of a woman was bad for their brand.

I’m sure the prosecution went with witnesses they thought would best help convict Ghomeshi.

They may have omitted them because of the perception that their case would be unwinnable, but having all the information ahead of time allows the Crown to bring in an expert witness to refute the stereotypes by explaining that people try to normalize their trauma. You can’t withhold relevant information, admit that…

What if these three women were the best examples (they probably were)?

I believe the victims, and Ghomeshi is an abusive piece of shit but this case isn’t an example of wacking. The victims just omitted parts of their communication from the Crown which is why they are so badly unprepared on the stand- which is sad.

To be fair, the focus was on what they told police about their communications with Jian afterward. And at least one (to my knowledge) admitted on the stand that she intentionally misled police by not mentioning she jerked him off (days?) after the attack happened.

That’s not what happened in this case. The accusers left out important details in their testimony and made it easy for the defense to paint them as unreliable.

It’s called a cross examination. All three accusers had serious problems in their testimony.

Like the default being crying “sexist!” and doing every possible to avoid having to address actual issues instead of perceived attacks on one of the most privileged women in the world?

Same reason that fan pic doesn’t look like One Piece at all besides the obvious clothing and hair. It’s a part of the One Piece signature style. Changing the style like in that pic makes it look like Deviant Art crap :/

I’m fairly certain nobody asked for this, but here we are: Luffy from One Piece gets turned into a lady for upcoming merch.

here I found the infographic of what it takes

That’s great and all, but we can’t even take care of our documented poor. Get on the grid and pay taxes, and you’re good. If you’re caught living here illegally, you should be fined but given a chance to naturalize. If you really can’t be bothered, then it probably isn’t a dire need for you to be here.

Pretty horrible, but sums up what many Hilary supporters believe. Somehow because I’m a woman I should be voting for Hilary because she’s one as well. Or I’m sexist because I don’t vote for Hilary. Everyone wants to talk about BernieBros, but Clinton supporters are just as bad (if not worse) when it comes to these…

So does BLM actually have centralised leadership? I was under the impression that it was relatively structureless (like the occupy protesters were).