I worked for a small town newspaper once and we were instructed that we are always to ask for people's permission to take their picture unless: there were more than five people present and the image's real object was something else, like a building or site where people just happened to be walking by. Because according…

Because Internet.

Eggs only are shown as "Bacon and Eggs minus Bacon" for the person preparing them. It's the same as ordering a Big Mac minus the lettuce, it's obviously doable because all you need to do is take stuff off. And as long as nobody invents a new fancy name for it, you won't confuse anyone with it. Same (basically) with…

People need to plan their meals ahead. You can get so much more out of your grocery budget - and drastically reduce your food waste - when you know what you will be needing for the week and how you will be using it. Make pasta carbonara one day and meringue cookies the next. Make mashed potatoes and turn the leftovers…

Except people are timed in some McDonald's stores. I can't remember the specifics because I was lucky enough to work in a franchise where the owner only wanted us to be fast but never made us fill out a questionnaire but to make something like 8 cheeseburger you had about 90 seconds. An order that adds 15 seconds to…

They won't do much to the burger, they don't have time for it. As far as spitting on food goes: it almost never happens. When you operate the grill for a few hours you are lucky if your eyes don't turn into ash and you shed your skin like a snake. We're slowly but surely being dehydrated. There isn't enough spit left…

Repeat after me: there is no secret menu. There is no secret menu. There is no secret menu.

1. Still an invasion of privacy with the implied knowledge that she wouldn't be happy about that. Implied both by : the fact that he had the means to get that information from her and the fact that he lied about it at first.

You seemed to imply that only those who see a problem look at both sides. Apologies if that wasn't what you meant.

I look at both sides too and I see a girl who was creeped on and a dude who wasn't outed to the public. You see a bitch and poor shmuck who was maybe a wee bit awkward. That's interesting but it doesn't make you more perspective or "right" then the people who disagree with you.

He wasn't really publicly humiliated. His name is censored, unless you are that creep or his best friend, you have no way of knowing who he really is. I'd agree if she had given out his full name and facebook contact but that didn't happen. You are arguing that a woman isn't allowed to publicize an example of extemely…

1. Got her last name from a 3rd source without her knowledge.

He wasn't rude? He knew where she worked and had access to the work space to introduce himself and inquire after her last name. Instead he went the stalker router, which he obviously knew was a bad move or he wouldn't have lied about it in the first place. Then he went on to sent her messages despite a complete lack…

It seems that the guy's last name is hidden, so his identity is more or less up to anyone's guess. Which means that publishing this isn't an act of direct aggression towards the guy, it's a warning to anyone who tries this sort of shit. And believe me, this happens daily. And the creep in question probably didn't do…

This reminds me of my most hardcore stalker experience. It's actually someone I met (in group settings where I had zero influence on the guest list!). He went from someone I pitied and listened to, to someone I was annoyed with to someone I feared would break into my home at night.

In contrast, argues Hanson, em brain models could be run at many different speeds in order to match different tasks.

And now I am sorry! I completely misread your intention and instead of clarifying, I steamed ahead and attacked you. I am very sorry. Please accept my apologies.

Of course they don't. The silver milk bucket was not intended for use either. The point is that you can only want to be associated with the brand if you are so far removed from its taint (=poverty, unskilled labour, no future) that it's comical or "tongue in cheek".

This is strange and you very probably didn't mean it that way, but your message felt oddly condescending. Maybe it's just me. (Did you perhaps think I was a teen/tween? I am far from either but maybe my low IQ and lack of English proficiency make me sound younger.)

Whenever in doubt on whether something is offensive to a group originally affiliated with that thing, ask yourself if they would use your "thought provoking" product or not. If they wouldn't, you probably did something wrong.