Well, perhaps they should start. It certainly hasn't hurt Sony or Microsoft.

You think Activision gives Microsoft those Call of Duty exclusivity deals out of the kindness of their hearts? Or Ubisoft that extra Assassin's Creed content to Sony?

It may not be Nintendo's responsibility to sell Ubisoft's games, but it's certainly their responsibility to sell the medium from which those games will be developed for.

I fully believe that this is ultimately Nintendo's fault. Like I said earlier, if Nintendo truly realizes that no one wants their system, they need…

That may be true, but Nintendo is clearly doing something wrong if the Wii U is selling well below projections. Again, if what's wrong is that there's no third party support, then Nintendo needs to go out of its way to woo that support. Ubisoft or EA won't develop a Wii U game out of pity.

Don't forget that all three console makers are also game makers. It's not like Nintendo can't make games for their own system or anything. Or at least they can pay for exclusivity like Microsoft loves to do.

Wii U sales are not Ubisoft's responsibility.

If Nintendo wants more consoles sold, they need to market it better and develop better games faster for their console, or at least pony up more cash to third parties for exclusives.

That sounds perfectly reasonable on Ubisoft's part. It's not their job to sell Nintendo's system for them, after all.

I remember seeing videos of people in Battlefield who do that (people taking point, people watching their sectors etc) although they don't necessarily use military jargon.

Thing is, these people are so coordinated as a team that they usually end up dominating.

The Walking Dead universe is just chock-full of zombies and convicts being transported.

Honestly, the only Nintendo title I'm really interested in so far is Pikmin. The others,as you guys already said, seem kinda safe.

TV TV TV

Using the controller's gyro in messaging seems like an interesting move.

Mildly related gaming news, but Giantbomb's recording equipment was stolen, so no post-E3 recap (which is one of my favourite E3 things) until they get all that figured out :(

Considering how good a service PS+ is (especially in stark contrast with Xbox Gold) is this necessarily a bad thing? Sooner or later, they're gonna have to start charging for online, it ain't cheap to run those servers. Plus, the console is $100 cheaper than the XOne.

This just popped up on the PS4 video channel

Oh thank god.

Nothing from you til the game comes out and we can all judge it not on three minute trailers, hopefully.

I guess we won't be hearing anything from you til the game releases, huh?

Oh look, it's a gamer judging a whole game based on three minutes of trailer. How original.

But does it turn?