I find it odd that anyone who could make as tone deaf a statement as this could sit upright, and randomly hit keys such that one of the most vacuous, insensitive strings of words I have ever encountered could appear as they have here.
I find it odd that anyone who could make as tone deaf a statement as this could sit upright, and randomly hit keys such that one of the most vacuous, insensitive strings of words I have ever encountered could appear as they have here.
Sounds like the sports world's version of a Bernie Madoff wannabe.
As for the company's explanation, all I can say is you talk about splitting (pubic) hairs...
Too bad they don't have soul doubles...
Thanks on both counts, Antonym. "Dildonic" is a throwback to my adolescence, a part of my mythic past, if you will.
Why is it that when trying to create an image of the future they would create, every politician invokes the mythic past? The halcyon days when kids worked in sweat shops, and women didn't have the right to vote, and there were no laws surrounding the quality of the food and water supply, right?
I am splitting pubic hairs here but the '66 was tits for me. 283 with a three on the tree and I was in heaven. Thanks for the memories...
It turns out that the famous Lombardi quote was actually "Fibbing isn’t a sometimes thing."
Sorry to hear about the couple of days, H. Bless you for your kind words. So glad I could raise and allay your hackles (and what lovely hackles they are!) in one fell swoop.
Forgive the delay, LL, but thanks for the kind words.
Hey, if the epithet fits, wear it.
Phil's the guy in this video. I know him from work. I am sure he will see this video, see these comments, and be freaked by seeing someone he doesn't recognize referring to him by name.
Nice job, Phil. You bring a depth to cluelessness that is startling.
Make them? They are born, my friend.
Thank you for your thoughtful comment.
Yvette, all I was saying was that, as an ex-lawyer, I found the attorney in this case to be way out of line, professionally speaking. She was coming to him to act as her adviser for purposes of emancipating herself from her parents. That she was technically not under-aged isn't relevant. Any lawyer with a shred of…
I don't think I am morally superior. If you don't want to be understood, that's fine with me.
Truth to tell, I didn't see your comment posted before mine. Apologies if it was up and I missed it.
Okay, well not so technically, an attorney's relationship with a client in this woman's position is one of a fiduciary nature. As in, even though she may be technically of age, it's an impropriety to engage in sexual relations with her while you are representing her in her attempt to emancipate herself from her…
It speaks volumes that Sandusky hired Amendola as his attorney. Given what I've read about his dealings with his under-aged-at-the-time wife, who better to understand the machinations a predator puts his victim through en route to becoming his pet project?