So you haven't read 1984? ***loads book into tube sock***
TheReverendFreshmaker
TheReverendFreshmaker
I'm really enjoying your work in the comments on this article. Just wanted to show support. Please keep up the good work.
I'm presuming you heard the Grandmama news through a publication. It's not like he's texting his thoughts to you directly.
Not a litigator either, but I don't the think the recordings were illegal. She had Sterling's consent, or at a minimum had a history of recording their conversations with his consent to the point where his claim that he had not consented to this recording is dubious.
"Why is dallasburnersclub emailing me dick pics? Nobody wants to see that."
I see it. I'm not impressed.
I can't speak for the NAACP, but I can tell you that your examples do not justify your generalization. Write a piece on the NAACP looking the other way for years and incite some outrage at the proper the target, without resorting to blanket statements that imply that the whole of society turned a blind-eye to the…
Sterling's bad behavior is well documented, and the outrage has been ongoing ever since. This is just the latest, least ambiguous, highly publicized, perfectly timed opportunity to get as loud as possible about kicking this shitheel out of the league.
If you were truly trying to be diplomatic, you wouldn't pull the AIDS card in order to assassinate the character of someone who was called out by name by a virulent racist. Sterling didn't mention AIDS, he mentioned race. Johnson is speaking to race. Regardless of the sexual exploits of a handful of black men in…
How provocative. I can make provocative statements too! You should kill yourself.
You are unambiguously wrong.
That should put an end to the conversation about Sterling's consent and the California two party consent law.
As long as the intent is holistic and not homolistic, it's all good.
Piling onto the gays? I see what you did here. #gayagenda
Adam and Eve would win fewer tag team matches than Adam and Steve.
What has two thumbs and loves antiquated mobile communication technology?
Running off a cliff will make you a better commenter. I honestly believe this. Me don't know any different.
Distribution of $10,000 If John takes a distribution of $10,000, it will be tax and penalty free because of the following reasons:
You've already paid tax on your Roth IRA contributions. So, you can withdraw your regular contributions at any time and at any age with no penalty or tax. After you withdraw an amount equal to all of your regular contributions, the earnings will be taxable. This is only true if the distribution isn't a qualified…