TheRealStyphin
TheRealStyphin
TheRealStyphin

I get it. But where is the line drawn? I can’t constantly be thinking “how is the seemingly innocuous comment going to offend someone, or trigger an episode of PTSD to someone who is a victim of rape, or who saw thier parent get murdered, or any number of tragic scenarios?” To expand on that point, did this guy know

That’s not really how we do things here, Jason.

Oh, I’m FINALLY convinced PC gamers are the “master race” because they can stream Bioshock.

I’m wondering the same thing. What the hell just happened? Did she stab the guy with sticks? If so, it wasn’t even remotely clear. All I saw was a blur accompanied by a “metal-hit-with-reverb” sound effect designed to tell me “something scary happened.”

I’m also an editor / VFX artist, and I once had creative director call rotoscoping “motorscoping.” My pals and I have been laughing about it and calling it “motorscoping” ever since.

Good thing Denver’s not on this list. Don’t come to Denver, everyone, there is nothing for you here.

“Duff’s Beer?” Not a big Simpsons fan, are ya?

I went to a McDonald’s at a scummy train station in Tokyo, and the Big Mac I ordered not only looked like it should have been used in a commercial shoot (in other words, picture perfect food), but it was the most delicious Big Mac I have ever eaten.

I can’t afford an HTC Vive, so I’ll just pirate it.

That's the first thing that's ever gone wrong.

Rhyming “asshole” with “asshole.” Such genius!

Fox really should have forked out to get Vince Gilligan to return to the writer’s chair, and maybe even helm an episode.

I think it’s open for interpretation. Cole COULD have given the scientists enough information that they discovered the guy on the plane is responsible, hence why you see the female scientist sitting next to the virus guy. Presumably she travelled back in time and was able to gather materials to produce a cure for her

But if they told Cole about his role in the outbreak, then he might have taken steps that would alter the outcome. ...Right?

“Same amount of money either way?” This is the one point that piracy apologists like yourself are constantly making, and the logic is so broken it’s fundamentally retarded. One pirated copy at $40 is $40 lost for Jonathan Blow. Now, $40 isn’t a lot if only that one copy of the game is pirated, but we’re probably

So piracy is the answer?

Sorry but Andrea sucked. Killing her off was the right move.

SPOT. ON. Why should folks who can’t afford something get to use it for free? I want a sports car, but I can’t afford it. So I can just drive one anyway? That’s not how the system works. Sure, digital content is it’s much easier to steal than a car, but that doesn’t make it any less wrong. I, for one, am all for

Oh, I get it. Sarcasm. HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH so funny. Although, I’m curious what YOU do for a living, and if YOU would mind if people stole from YOUR place of business, or scammed you out of your craft or trade. As a tv/film editor, I have watched budgets grow smaller and smaller and day-rates drop further and further as

So the solution is stealing? Do you really think piracy will show these big companies the error of thier practices, particularly in how they treat thier hardworking developers? Will stealing thier games change their minds and give thier developers more money/time? That’s an idiotic premise.