The5thElephant
The5thElephant
The5thElephant

The data shows it’s more expensive to execute a criminal than to imprison them for life. So you are actually paying more of your tax money for executions.

You realize that each state’s nature/environment does not suddenly end at their borders? If you pour stuff into a river in one state it will go into another state. If you pollute the air in one state it will drift and diffuse into another state. This is why federal regulations still need to exist and not everything

In other words you are asking for changes to the EPA, not it’s complete destruction. But what Pruitt wants is for the EPA to go away, for the regulations to go away, and for nothing to take their place.

You can see in the video they change a lot of the details from the model itself when they transitioned to CG.

Can you actually point out where they have far exceeded their power? How would destroying the EPA entirely be effective at changing that?

You have no opinion on something that has significant impact on technology and the future of the human race? Kind of lame if you ask me.

Please point out companies that have external investigations done of their proprietary factories. I’ll wait.

He has already stated he will investigate the claims made about that factory by a person with a vested interest in sabotaging Tesla.

So basically you are ignoring that Musk showed zero support for Trump while campaigning, Trump’s proposed energy policies can directly negatively impact Musk’s companies, Musk would have had a huge ally with Clinton, Musk is trying to push Trump toward alternative energy, etc. He straight up just said Trump’s

Because he has explicitly stated that he started these companies to improve humanity, not just his wallet. Tesla gave away many patents on electric car development, and Space X is a massive risk with a lot of effort going into projects that are not guaranteed to be profitable but can significantly advance our ability

Considering Musk can’t magically make Trump not the President why shouldn’t he do his best to push Trump towards good business and environmental policy? I prefer the admin to have at least some sane and rational advice.

It seems to be heavily associated with slow-motion scenes since the sound helps imply that time and therefore the frequency of sounds are slowing.

But those are way harder to actually achieve than people realize. It doesn’t mean they won’t be, but it is likely that by the time they are invented we will have a much greater understanding of nano-tech/gene-therapy and can also create capable defenses against them.

At what point does the US military put it’s foot down and say that Trump has no idea what he is doing when it comes to national security or military planning, not to mention the US military takes climate change very seriously.

It’s amazing you don’t see the hypocrisy in getting upset at valid criticism of the President-elect and in response say people should go to their safe spaces.

This...is a perfect description.

I’m out of touch because I don’t go trawling through the greys (no such thing on Breitbart, another differentiating factor) for gross content? The greys get mostly ignored, but on Breitbart some of the top comments with the most discussion are filled with abhorrent crap.

No. No you can’t find comments on Jezebel or The Concourse that come anywhere close to what you find on Breitbart. Like are you even looking or just making claims? Its rare to even come across someone calling for Trump to be assassinated (I have never seen that anywhere on Gawker network), while on Breitbart I would

Except we are actually pushing ISIS back in more than one of their major occupied cities.