My theory is its essentially engine breaking plus regular braking. Not all that different from a manual.
Does it make sense to buy this in 10 years after it depreciates a bit?
Phones are just portable infotainment systems.
Actually it is engine degreaser. Is the consuming thing a new challenge? I don’t keep up with the #youths
Oh ok, I think I may have just misunderstood what you were saying.
Motorcycle transmissions use engine oil without friction modifiers in it.
I think he’s talking about the corners
That honestly looks rather good. Really good in fact.
My dad works for GM in Texas and has an employee car.
The editors definitely shouldn’t sleep on this.
Not with that attitude they’re not.
Because it’s not as fun.
This game got me into cars.
There are none.
Nah it’s just illumination for when the path gets dark.
Remember its 280 at the wheels so its probably much higher at the crank
I guess that makes sense and I can get behind it, however I still think it is weighted too heavily in the NCAP ratings. For example, the 2017 Kia Rio (first one I saw that they tested both standard safety features and safety package) the standard features car scored 3 out of 5 stars while the one with the safety pack…
You replied to one of the very motorcyclists you speak of. I ride everyday rain or shine. I am not against pedestrian safety by any means. I just think there should be a separate rating for crash tests for occupants and for pedestrians.
Goddammit I’m not against pedestrian safety. I just don’t think it should be tied into overall ratings like this. It should be a separate rating. One for occupants and one for pedestrians.