Bet she doesn’t wave.

I just want to putter down the street in a Bonneville T120 Black, and I’ll be happy for ever, and it will be my last bike I promise.

I love it, but I’d also probably never buy one. Here in Canada I’d be looking at $72,000 for a Rubicon with most (but not all) the options. I can get a lot of car or truck for $72,000.

This is flat out dishonest bullshit.

I consider myself fairly critical of Tesla’s marketing practices, and I would have to disagree with you here. This is a quote taken from an earnings call, where Elon specifically clarifies the statement.  This isn’t a tweet, or a public statement.  If such a tweet or public statement does exist, which wouldn’t really…

If all the features planned for the game are in place and working to any extent, yes. Because that’s what the term “feature complete” means. As I stated in my initial post, this in no way means the product is complete or ready for consumer interaction. But the statement “feature complete” is accurate in this case…

To be frank, software like this can never be 100% safe. That’s not the goal, as it is unattainable. There will always be unknown variables, glitches, unexpected interactions, etc. The goal is to make the software safer than a human driver. Should the software be released before it reaches that stage? Now that is…

“Feature Complete” is a pretty common statement in video games or software development.

Part of the issue, as told to me by multiple dealers in my area, is the allocation. My city of 400,000ish got like 50 allocated for the year. And that’s relatively high, as many of them took on a pile of low sales vehicles in order to get more gladiators.

For the cost, I’ll take a pickup and a Four Wheel Camper, or some sort of pop top like the AT summit.

Fuck anything and anyone that stops that car from being global.

Ahhh, gotcha.  That would make sense.  I’ve only ever seen them as open air.

How would you keep a proper balance in the winter when you get snow and ice in the tire while driving around? This obviously isn’t a concern if you don’t ge real winter where you are.

A) My Wrangler hauls ungainly things amazingly well, being essentially a large box.

Before all you off-road folks freak out...

Hopefully the city building thing goes better for them than it did for Ford.

I also tried a couple of times to get through the first one.  In the end, I gave up.  It’s just way too, as you have rightfully said, damned janky.  I watched a youtube story recap and moved to Witcher 2.  Thank god I did.  Though still janky, it is one of my favourite games of all time.

Brand loyalty is stupid.

That would be my assumption as well. Which would put the payload at like 600 lbs. I can’t find anyone who will give me a straight answer to the question though.

Here’s the thing though... does the added weight of the diesel cut into the Wrangler’s already abysmal payload?