So, a cibernetically embedded version of this?

Except EA already threw the "cloud computing" argument at us, and it was proven bullshit. It's just plain old DRM. Plus, MMO games already do the "continuing in between individual sessions" thing, and while they onvously require you to be online to play, they obviously don't require you to check in every 24 hours.

What was the name of that tech that ATI cards had that rounded off polygons through software tricks? I don't remember it exactly, but I distinctly remember playing Morrowind in 2003 with that feature on. I remember trying it on Counter Strike even earlier, but it didn't look that good because it made some surfaces…

No, I did see it, it just didn't excite me much... The only high-profile exclusive is Bayonetta 2, and many multi-platform titles are not hitting the Wii U.

Looks really charming. Great sprites and animations. Love the look on their faces in the fallng bridge segment.

So, after all is said and done, my prizes for best-looking games in E3 go to... Mario Kart 8, Mirror's Edge 2 and Battlefield 4 (due to the multiplayer trailer, especially)

Yea.... I love 3D Land, but I expected a bit more. It kind of occupies the same space as SMBU, too, imo, with four-player local multiplayer and whatnot. Maybe they'll save their big Galaxy-moment for later.

wonderful 101?

Well, they *are* bringing in Wonderful 101 as a new IP (even if it's not a new E3 announcement, and even if I'm not terribly interested in it, myself).

both

Heh. When I say the smash + sign, i couldn't help but go "SMASH!"

yup. freaking gorgeous in HD. actually surpassed all my expectations.

Nintendo kotaku'd!

Not disputing that.

Yea, I get that. Sounds like a good value. Still, mandatory payment over something that once was free (barebones multiplayer)... not good.

meh. I might get the PS4 (especially now that the 400 dollars price is out) to play the exclusive SP games... Will keep playing multiplayer on PC (battlefield 4, Day Z, Guild wars 2)

yea, that last part wasn't so good :\

Yea, I foolishly preordered it, based on my previous experience with DA:O. That said, most reviews seemed to be "positive", scoring around 80/100 or so (for all good that this number-score scheme is worth). It was a huge letdown, for me. If I were to score it, it wouldn't be above a 60/100. Wouldn't recommend anyone…

it WAS a bad game. "let's center a game on a single city", great idea "let's make it so the city is tiny and frozen and completely uninteractive" terrible idea. "let's make the combat more active" good idea "let's make it so there's waves of enemies on every encounter rendering any kind of tactical positioning moot" ba…

Please EA don't screw this up please EA don't screw this up please EA don't screw this up please EA don't screw this up PLEASE EA DONT SCREW THIS UP