As Danny Baker put it on Twitter this morning, "JK Rowling is suing the Daily Mail. If I were her I'd just buy it and fire the fucking lot of them."

The Daily Mail has done the same thing to Jack Monroe (for those unfamiliar, Google- she's the bomb), another single mother who worked her ass off trying to make a better life for her kids, found a product (in Jack's case, recipes for cheap, healthy food) that people on all sides of the fence are clamoring for, and…

Away with you, Daily Mail!

Indeed, sue that paper to oblivion. It will improve the world a bit if the Daily Mail stops existing.

I'd set up a small monthly payment to that.

I would get behind that. Could we set up a charity, do you think? "All donations go to suing the Daily Mail for whatever they've done this week."

Everyone should be suing the daily mail all the time.

Just as a reminder to everyone that didn't see the last Dredd movie in theaters...

There was actually just an article about Amazon cracking down on both incest and monster porn because of the beastiality over tones. A bunch of these books got pulled for the titles/covers/descriptions and had to be resubmitted with proper info. I think it's pretty shitty to not just say what your book is about…

"If I don't get any, NO ONE gets any!"

The face of the war against blowjobs.*

I spotted at least three pics with full frontal and genitalia that were (apparently) fashion instead of porn. Since the site is in Italian it's probably using European fashion *snicker* spreads instead of the tamer stuff from the US.

Basically, Baxter did that super annoying and patronizing thing of writing a piece that was all about "You're doing it wrong because you're not doing it like ME" and not about finding any abuses of funders or lies in the original entreaties.

I agree, on all points. *The Vagenda* is a great feminist read that's managed to sustain the buzz it created when it launched close to 2 years ago. Holly and Rhiannon are also regular contributors to *The New Statesman*, another feather in their cap which I happen to think they've earned.

"Guys. That was a tongue-in-cheek article about crowdfunding. While I welcome criticism, please stop threatening to "shank" me"

These types of filters are hella problematic. Most schools in the UK (idk about schools in other countries) already have these sort of safe-filter blocks on their internet access that are supposed to block the bad stuff but inevitably end up blocking a lot of the good stuff, too. I remember trying to access an LGBT…

Odds/under on the amount of time that will pass before a socialist website/blog gets 'accidentally' caught in the coalition-approved spam filters? Remember that Cameron is the shameless piece of shit who tried to ban unions from donating to political parties because he knew it would nigh-on-exclusively harm Labour,…

I don't like how you're kicked off as soon as you get it wrong. I can't get out of the single digits! Although, I'm not really in the mood for these pics, so, not sorry.

Yes, because you can tell fashion from porn based on a picture of someones face alone.

Yup.

new game, porn or picture from a business magazine, we'll crop every picture to only show their nose.

Also It's stupid because you get one wrong and you fail the entire test, Why don't you let me take the entire test and then give…

Some of these (before) pictures are just faces or eyes. I feel that the test is a bit skewed, and it'd be a lot more effective if they just got the raciest fashion ads and showed them in full. A lot of them would look like porn anyway. There's no need to resort to what appears to be manipulation. Even old-timey ads…