Odds/under on the amount of time that will pass before a socialist website/blog gets 'accidentally' caught in the coalition-approved spam filters? Remember that Cameron is the shameless piece of shit who tried to ban unions from donating to political parties because he knew it would nigh-on-exclusively harm Labour,…

I don't like how you're kicked off as soon as you get it wrong. I can't get out of the single digits! Although, I'm not really in the mood for these pics, so, not sorry.

Yes, because you can tell fashion from porn based on a picture of someones face alone.

Yup.

new game, porn or picture from a business magazine, we'll crop every picture to only show their nose.

Also It's stupid because you get one wrong and you fail the entire test, Why don't you let me take the entire test and then give…

The pictures are intentionally cropped to make it difficult to differentiate fashion from porn. The same could be done with, say, sunscreen ads.

Some of these (before) pictures are just faces or eyes. I feel that the test is a bit skewed, and it'd be a lot more effective if they just got the raciest fashion ads and showed them in full. A lot of them would look like porn anyway. There's no need to resort to what appears to be manipulation. Even old-timey ads…

Par for the fucking course for Reddit, sadly.

These men do themselves no favours at all. There are lots of constructive things they could do - support male victims (or better still all victims), work with others to deal with some of the causes of rape and stop trivialising rape by making false allegations as some form of bizarre method of protest. Shameful and…

I despise this sort of intellectually lazy kneejerk hate.

Seriously, MRAs: fuck you. You're a waste of oxygen and space. There are legitimate issues that gender roles create for men: our culture overlooks sexual assault and domestic violence that happens to men and encourages them not to report, it acts like women are the real parents and dads are incidental (e. g., there…

The whole idea of a god seems pretty antithetical to anarchy... at least the Christian god, who's basically an absolute dictator that throws out arbitrary rules like "no homo."

Ive been a respectful, intelligent poster on huffpo for years, with hundreds of fans and a good rep. That doesnt mean I want my personal information out on the interwebz for all to see. My wife is even more adamant against this than I am. Theres absolutely no reason to require people to use real, personal…

Arianna is a liar along with her staff. Back in August there was a promise that all commentators would be grandfathered in and did not need Facebook link. Yesterday to comment ALL needed a facebook link. I will not due FB and lots won't either.

Ive decided to bitch on every article relating to huffpo. They changed their posting requirements, now you have to use your real name on your posts. Even after saying you wouldnt need to use your real name. Im still royally pissed.

I don't think this is true. I think you be shocked and dismayed be the type of people who engage in this. They are probably people you meet throughout your day, colleges kids, high school boys, teachers, bankers, plumbers, cab drivers, husbands, brothers, wives... The sheer number of people who do this precludes it…

I'm a teacher. I'm also incredibly into me, so I take nude pics of myself all the time. I also have videos that I send to my partners... this combination (being a teacher and having nude pictures of myself on my computer/email) now terrifies me.

Agreed - at a minimum you would think that women who had photos taken as documentation by their surgeons should not have to risk any repercussions, nor should women who didn't even pose for photos. And if we're just talking about Playboy-style nudes (as compared to porn-type images) how is this something people should…

I can't decide what's more frustrating - that people like Hunter Moore exist or that people are so up tight over nudity that a woman can lose her job over private photos leaked for all the world to see.

I thought the link to this article was on the front page of one of the Gawker sites - because I definitely didn't notice the date, but it's possible it was in one of Gawker's new similar-content/recommended boxes that's automatically inserted right in the middle of an article. I've noticed lately that some of those…

What these men did was disgusting, but, not accepting funds does a disservice to the women who willingly participated under the assumption money would be donated to breast cancer research/foundation/patients/etc.. Since I work in oncology, I've pondered how I would feel about receiving these funds, and my concern was…

It's because their interest isn't in the philanthopy, it's in the PR. Awful humans.