I've had a quick search on Twitter, but I'm not used to searching it and going back through older conversations, and Google, but I don't think I'm getting the entire picture.
TPL2008
TPL2008
He sounds like a masochist in some ways, deliberately seeking out ways to torture himself mentally and not really doing anything to get himself out of his rut.
It seemed clear enough to me.
Have you seen Penelope Cruz's recent debut work, an ad for lingerie too, as a director? Might be something Jezebel might want to take a look at.
I don't understand it either. It effects no-one materially at all, and most people can barely tell you which person is on which note anyway.
While this is a good move from Twitter, didn't Caitlin Moran threaten to make a someone "piss through a straw" on Twitter a couple of months ago after he wrote something about her husband?
Nothing in that photo looks quite real. I'm not even sure he's actually standing in front of that background.
A game of dominoes isn't the first thing that pops into mind when you think of the Playboy Mansion.
One feminist, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, went so far as to say that reading 50 Shades of Grey was a betrayal of feminism and that young women in particular were aiding and abetting the pornification (a popular word in the press) of Britain. When a former female porn director wanted to stand as an MP, feminist groups wrote…
The anger behind the insults mystifies me. The campaign to put Austin wasn't even trying to ban or restrict anything like so many other campaigns (not that that would justify threats and abuse, of course). It would effect their lives not one iota.
That's accurate from what I understand.
Apart from those two I mentioned almost all feminist articles and statements seem to indicate the women/feminism and porn are incompatible.
Caitlin Moran is an interesting focal point for this issue. I was reading only today how she was accused of making a rape joke on Twitter last year.
"Really. And assuming outdated things about men and women and sex and lust and porn doesn't seem very, uh, feminist."
I thought the same.
I agree. If its point was to swap ideal/expected gender forms, it failed in my opinion.
That was my initial thought too.
I think the issue with not tackling double standards is that you perhaps shift around privilege and/or protection from one demographic to another, rather than sharing it out.
I'm sure a lawyer could make a case out of such a comment.