You really thought that the reason people are fascinated by Kim Kardashian is because her butt is "naturally interesting"? What in the world led you to that conclusion? Guys like her because she's hot, I'm not sure why women do. Again, not sure where "naturally" or "interesting" enters into it.

Anyone who actually believes that this is about something other than Chelsea Handler wanting to show off her ass is kidding themselves.

Which two words?

Brilliant.

Your research is commendable, your conclusions unassailable. At this point, every one of my 15 likes is a separate badge of shame.

Wow, way to pick the two most superficial and mechanical criticisms to respond to. Thanks for clarifying what you meant by "small fedora" and "scolded for the wrong reasons"; care to address the complaints about your complete lack of journalistic integrity, straw man bullshitting, and refusal to hold prominent members…

And that didn't?

Take it easy, I'm a millenial who would kill a stranger for a Watchamacallit.

Was wondering the same thing.

Debatable. It depends on whether the game is causing Isis to weaponize Ebola or if it's merely changing a pre-existing plan.

Spider Man at #2? GTFO.

God, Burneko, you and your list-trolling.

Drew, if it's any comfort to you, grocery store workers don't really mind cleaning up kid messes. As long as it's store product and not bodily fluids, I always considered it a welcome diversion from getting bitched at by customers or superiors.

The only issue here is that Emma Watson was sexualized well before the HP movies wrapped up, because she's quite a bit hotter than Radcliffe.

Being able to dish it out but not take it isn't even remotely ironic...you really need to slow your roll.

Amazing.

That's totally fair. I didn't really mean anything derogatory when I said "country boys", I just meant something like "country bros". I get what you're saying about trying to alert people to issues on the roads, I try to be helpful too, but trying to alert someone to a broken trailer hitch or something is pretty…

You're partially correct, but mostly wrong. The Civil War wasn't "about" states' rights in the sense that the Confederacy didn't secede because of philosophical differences about states' rights vs. federal power, but the conflict itself and the outcome of the war was in fact a massive test of states' rights. Obviously…

What the fuck point are you trying to make?

Anyway, hopefully the dozen of other replies that popped up have made it sufficiently clear what a terrible suggestion/attempt to pass the buck that was on your part.