Not so fast! I’d argue that Kim K and her butt are what started the trend for bigger women to be fashionable and sexy. Prior to that, the “hot-girl” icons were rail thin Paris Hilton types.
Ok “Boomer”, lets lay out some facts:
This entire thing is enlightening for me. But does no one see the hypocrisy here? The idea in this article boils down to “you believe what you believe so strongly that anyone else must be a total moron.”
Ahh, you were using a straw man argument. The entire article is about how terrible Paul Ryan is for supporting autism! Why are there no comments other than mine showing condemnation for that attack?! I’ll ask you directly, do you think the position of this article is offensive and wrong?
How is this not hyper offensive and wrong? What right do you/we have to say what cause Paul Ryan can believe in? Maybe he has family members with autism or worked with autistic people and feels strongly about it. Do you really think its the moral high ground to say he’s a terrible person for believing in a cause?
How is this not hyper offensive and wrong? What right do you/we have to say what cause Paul Ryan can believe in? Maybe he has family members with autism or worked with autistic people and feels strongly about it. Do you really think its the moral high ground to say he’s a terrible person for believing in a cause?
How is this not hyper offensive and wrong? What right do you/we have to say what cause Paul Ryan can believe in? Maybe he has family members with autism or worked with autistic people and feels strongly about it. Do you really think its the moral high ground to say he’s a terrible person for believing in a cause?
Can you explain this to me? Do people pretend/believe that social security and Obamacare are NOT broken? Like, if no one touches either program everyone will win?
You have an interesting theory but I think the opposite is true. You are totally right that its hard to prove a negative and absence of evidence vs evidence of absence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence
: ) Thanks for the civil conversation! I can’t believe we were able to understand and agree with each other’s perspectives ONLINE!!! Is this real life? Is America getting greater again? ; )
The goal was to get more people insured, and reduce the rate of growth for insurance premiums. I don’t recall there ever being an intention of not subsidizing insurance for the poor.
Now that he’s actually aware of the reality of the situation, he’s balking. He knows he can’t stop the train now, but he’s acutely aware of how bad this plan is for his voting base
They got burned when the GOP walked back Obama’s promise to help offset their initial losses.
Great reply, thank you. So initially Trump didn’t want that to happen right? He wanted repeal and replace for the good of the Americans but now its changed? Is it more complicated than previously thought? Or is it political... let Obamacare fail on its own since so many people seem to think it’s fine and will…
I agree Aetna is a lousy company to deal with (from experience)... and merger suspicions aside, isn’t my point true? That Obamacare is out of money in 2017?
+1, I had them at one point too and hated them. But my original statement I think is True? And I think the Republican plan was slated for 2019? In which case won’t a bunch of Obamacare people that were lucky enough to get the government to take out loans to pay their bills lose their “free” insurance anyway?
Is this true or false? If Republicans don’t do anything, Obamacare will die in 2017 anyway.
What!? We are all desperately waiting a chipworks xray of the chip! They could have donated their chip, scrapped with a razor blade, and photographed through a $100 microscope for the good of the internet! What a waste!
The Wii U is still a great deal if you don’t have one. You can often find the games cheap and it’s got some incredible ones!