SulaymanF
SulaymanF
SulaymanF

Sadly, the guest turned an opportunity to have a substantive, informative discussion into an obviously calculated personal insult campaign. We were disappointed in the segment and respect our audience’s time too much to consider airing it.

Now playing

respect our audience’s time too much to consider airing it

The thing is, they were willing to vote for the several-times-over millionaire from NYC. Which is odd, but whatever.

Fox has the same problem the GOP has — people don’t love billionaires or what they want to do in politics.

It’s really interesting, seeing these tantrums Fox News is throwing, given their sudden reckoning with all of these policy beliefs, that they thought were in their favor, now gradually teetering in the other direction. Instead of discussing the actual ideas, they are attacking the people presenting them (this Bregman

Rutger, hauer you so single-handedly destroying these evil bastards? It’s like you’re some sort of historian super hero or something.

I would ‘like’ to think the over-the-top response is because she’s a Muslim woman, which is amongst the top Republican bogeymen.

I swear, the Omar thing pisses me off. You can’t even remotely criticize Israel or their cronies without immediately being labelled anti-semitic. From the same group of people that pull out their fainting couch every time a liberal calls someone racist for doing blatantly racist shit (like Trump, regularly). And the

The stain in office is attempting to gaslight the entire country.

Fact checkers have become Fake News.
Fact checkers have become Fake News.

Why do they have those stupid costumes?  Can’t they just be regular people playing the characters?  Or, just not make this porn parody in the first place because not every movie needs a porn parody, especially since they are erotic drawings on the characters on the Internet that make this whole parody pointless?

Ooooh! Here we go again, folks! Let’s take yet another trip down the patented Trump Stages of Denial!

That’s a dumb assumption on their part, not guilty =/= she consented.  Shitbag may be trying to claim the DNA lab screwed up or there was no sexual contact.  Odds of either of those being true are astronomical however.

The family has even come out and practically begged journalists to get this right. Yet here we still are. 

What is so hard about saying/writing, “ SEVERELY DISABLED?”

They’re jettisoning assets and rearranging the books in advance of the lawsuit they know is coming so they won’t have to pay out. That’s what’s happening here.

Your comment was more interesting that the article and possibly the movie, I must say.

“..The problem with the question of ‘what do men want?’ is that they usually just tell you, rather inelegantly...”

Ali Davis, a sports agent