"Changing someone's personal preference to your own is like trying the sun from rising."

If people actually followed the rules like they're supposed to, and not make inane house rules that prolong the game to eternity, Monopoly isn't that bad to play.

You mean like his first appearance?

What is it with Smash Bros fan games and adding anime characters as playable fighters? Super Smash Flash 1 and 2 and now this all have either Goku or fucking Naruto as playable characters and I just do not understand why.

Like, what is the connection to Nintendo that could warrant them even being in the game to begin…

They should just add third-person perspective to this game and be done with it. It provides a better view of the area and people are using all these workarounds to get that advantage that shouldn't be required.

That puzzle game actually looks pretty good. It looks like Puzzle Quest, except it's Final Fantasy and PICROSS instead of Bejeweled. WHY CAN'T I HAVE THIS?

Every single time I see the title for this show/these games, I immediately find my brain infected with the earworm of "Sonic Boom" from Sonic CD. So... y'know... thanks for that.

KH really isn't that hard to understand.

Swatting should be treated as a serious crime.

The only fucking time I will preorder something is if it gives a physical item. For example, Resident Evil 5 gave a fucking snowglobe when you preordered. That is something unique, something specifically limited in a physical manifestation to say "I bought this". Extra digital crap? I can live without that.

......so I know For Glory removes items that appear randomly, but I don't see the issue with leaving items that generate via character (Turnip, Link's Bomb, etc.) in the game as it IS part of their move-set. While the turnip is such a small thing that it won't matter if it is removed, doesn't removing these items…

I guess Square REALLY misunderstood what we meant when we asked for Final Fantasy Type 0.

Fixed.

Pedant mode on: The line was "Phenomenal cosmic power.... itty bitty living space." (not "infinite")

Actually your wrong on both accounts. The PSeye for PS3 was released in 2007, whereas the kinect was released in 2010. In terms of being a success, people are actively seeking the PS4 camera. To the point that it is hard to find in stores. Now the Kinect may have sold more units, but that is only because it was…

I don't own a PS Camera and don't plan to own one. The whole "voice control" thing is just another gimmick, like motion sensing. But I'll play along:

It's more like comparing a Chromebook with a Celeron and a Chromebook with an i7-4790k. Yes, one is stronger, but the available applications won't push either one, so it's a moot point.

They did price Kinect 2.0 at $99.... and made it part of the system.

XB1/Kinect Bundle - $500

Tell that to my internet provider. =/