StrongerThanWine
StrongerThanWine
StrongerThanWine

Breaking up with someone because their swearing is "unladylike" is pretty undisguised misogyny.

Now playing

Yeah, but did she make him touch her hands for stupid reasons?

Because the chatlogs of the originators tell us so.

If you ask for a few thousand dollars to make some videos and an assortment vapid, malicious, childish idiots throw an awesome temper-tantrum leading reasonable people to denote many times as much as you asked for, chances are you aren't the one with the problem.

Why does someone have to make their own game to criticize the creative expression behind the use of certain tropes in games? I hear that argument a lot, but I don't think it is really a valid one. Nobody is going to force a developer from making games with damsels in distress. Nobody is going to force a developer from

Gamergate is many things, but innocuous is not one of them.

Douche-to-English translation: "SMILE, girl."

I know there is more to the story, but "300-year-old Lorde jumped in the ring" made lol so much.

That's the plan.

Wow. What a one-sided article. The vote spam is actually about ethics in games journalism.

Long story short, I ended up with an emergency c section. I posted that scene and on FB and told everyone it was my #birthstory.

He isn't mentally ill, he's entitled.

Don't listen to mean KK4Bama, Warrie! Talk to your new friends. Tell them everything. You'll feel better!

Again, why any guy (I guess straight or otherwise) would consider "dick-sucker" to be an insult when, chances are, they probably enjoy the skillz of said dick-sucker is completely beyond me. Like, "you fucking cake-baker," or "you fucking fine artist," or "you fucking artisan jeweler." Go on, insult people for doing

The White Man's Apology:

"Since I recently <insert horrible abusive action here>, I've been suffering so much [from the reasonable consequence of people hating me and trying to bring pragmatic legal action against me]."

Allow me to save everyone some time by summarizing the pro-occupation crowd's entire response "1. This article is soooooooooo one-sided. It doesn't even try to tell the story from the death threat makers' perspective. 2. Disagreement with the death threats is anti-semitic."

Moreover, Conflict Kitchen's (largely conservative) pro-Israel critics are still propagating the frankly insane notion that the restaurant has some responsibility to include the perspective of both sides of the conflict.

They should change the acronym to WAEIGJ (Women Against Ethics In Gaming Journalism.)

I am all for free speech, but IMHO, any threat received through social media should be per se legitimate, and the corresponding ISP should be blocked from the site. Yes, the trolls will still probably find a way. Fine. But still, harassment is harassment, and it shouldn't be tolerated, period. Block the offender from