StingingV
StingingVelvet
StingingV

Wow that analogy. Tone it down if you ever actually expect to have a discussion with an omnivore on this subject.

Ah. Fair point I suppose since Davies invented the concept, but 1) it took place off camera, which is different, and b) RTD spent his entire tenure showing the Doctor broken by it.

I don't really feel like having a vegetarian debate with you, sorry. My point is if family farming is out of your reach you're forced to eat factory meat by simple lack of options. In your mind becoming vegetarian would be an option there, but for most it isn't because eating meat is a need, a natural and normal need.

Makes sense. Also makes sense Fantastic Four won't be. Good decisions.

This movie freaked me out as a kid already. It's by far the scariest, creepiest "kid's movie" I have ever seen.

Hence "can and should be done respectfully."

1) Summarizing.

I didn't say anyone was right-wing, I said it depends on HOW left-wing they are. Or at least how much they want to push certain concepts. RTD was actually writing the Doctor as pacifist 99% of the time. I assume your "double genocide" was the two Dalek fleets, but the first was destroyed by Rose and the second by the

Doctor Who always varies in these areas depending on how left-wing the production team is. Sometimes he's vegetarian, sometimes he loves a good steak. Sometimes he's a total pacifist who won't even touch a gun to save a planet, other times he's blowing up entire fleets (or planets) and being giddy about it. The same

You win, Sir.

That clone episode in Enterprise Season 3... Similitude I think?... probably deserves to be on here. That's literally the only correction I have though, this is a very well thought out list I cannot complain about. Well done!

As bad as Voyager could be there is far more than one decent episode among its 150+ episodes. Year of Hell is probably one of my favorite Trek stories in general, from any show.

I'm too distracted by how dumb the "shooting the bugs off Adrien Brody without looking" part is to notice the horror.

I hear you. I hate Agents of SHIELD but I have to give this a try because of the cast and characters. That's exactly what AOS is lacking.

I don't really see The Dark Knight trilogy as dark so much as grounded in a cinematic realism. That's what I crave in superhero movies, rather than darkness. As a film fan, sci-fi fan and fantasy fan (and NOT a comic book fan) it's what speaks to me.

I definitely like the connected Marvel universe in the films, but I do worry about the TV series spreading things out too much. I don't like Agents of SHIELD and don't want to watch it, and thus I dislike how I feel like it might come into play in a film and annoy me. Coulson pops up and goes "miss me?" and I just

I couldn't disagree more on the DC stuff. All these comic book movies are adaptations and DC just adapts the content more for cinema then Marvel does. Marvel makes comic books on film, DC makes movies inspired by comic books. I think both avenues have a ton of merit, and I think Nolan's Batman films are by far

I wish sometimes we could allow for arguments against female promiscuity without being all "WELL IT'S OKAY WHEN MEN DO IT!" Maybe the person making the argument against promiscuity feels that way about both sexes, you know? Maybe that person feels like both genders should chill the fuck out with the casual sex.

I have this weird mindset where I can actually enjoy and pay more attention to a movie or show if I know generally what's going to happen. There was an article about that kind of mindset on here before I believe. I often enjoy something more the second-go because I can pay more attention to the subtleties and nuances

Or to sign a deal with Disney where he gets to direct a couple vanity projects in return for playing Cap in three more movies.