Here’s what I don’t understand. This stood out to me during the Superbowl commercials too. Just about everyone agrees this car is gorgeous from the rear. Even more so from the side. The front... well EVERYONE knows it’s a polarizing design.

Sorry! I was bored!!!

Lol. I’m fully on-board with the Subaru lesbian jokes. They did cater heavily to the LGBT community for a while (and still do!)

HOO-CHEE-LA!!!

Neither are your “LOLs” :P

AND GOOD DAY, SIR!!!!

It is also against the law to have a bad opinion of your leader in some countries.

In NY state, it is not illegal.

Yeah, in the long run I imagine most vehicles will shut off the majority of their sensors, and they’ll all work together, probably using information fed from smart roadways so that they don’t necessarily need to use sensors to identify the road itself.

It’s more the short-term that I’m wondering about. What happens…

So legitimate question: What happens when every single car on the road is using radar-based cruise control? How do they not interfere with each other? Is it easy to distinguish your own radar signature? Will the radar waves be “coded” so that they are unique to the vehicle emitting them?

I’ve already seen my friend’s…

I’m just thoroughly enjoying watching you fail at offering any sort of logical argument. It’s been slow at work lately, so you’ve been entertaining me :)

I don’t need any sort of vindication. My car obliterates Toyota Camrys in the situations for which I purchased it, which was not for drag racing, but track days and…

I love how you have no logical argument, so you just keep saying “butt-hurt” over and over since it’s the only point you actually have to make. There’s a reason some of my responses have multiple stars, while yours don’t :P

I dunno who was in the wrong here (dunno what the etiquette is out there), but that rider is damned lucky that the Jeep driver slammed on the brakes when he did. In the slow-motion portion, you can see the Jeep “skid” to a stop in the sand. If that Jeep had braked a moment later, that guy would have slammed into the…

Whatever you say, boss. I’ll continue obliterating every V6 Camry I’ve come across at my autocross events :)
I suggest you look up the definition of “sports car” when you get a chance, by the way. You might be surprised to find out you don’t know what it is.

Put a MASSIVE engine and wide enough tires on anything and it can keep up with most anything else.

That said, I prefer the feeling of a car on track that feels like it’s taking advantage of the laws of physics (via reduced mass, etc...) rather than obliterating them (via 12-foot-wide tires and 6-million horsepower.)

Lol. I’m not butthurt. Can’t be mad at someone who doesn’t understand what they’re talking about ;)

It would be like being mad at a mentally challenged kid. He doesn’t know any better.

It isn’t against the law in NY, where this took place, though. Not unless there was a sign on the roadway explicitly stating so.

I agree on that one. I honestly think he could have avoided it if he was paying more attention. Hell, it happened to me literally two nights ago with an idiot who was going back and forth between 70 and 60 in the passing lane and not moving over, and then accelerated to over 80 when I finally went to pass and nearly…

To be completely fair, I never said he said it was against the law. It isn’t stupid either. It’s necessary in a country where nobody knows how to keep right. There’s a reason it isn’t illegal. You must live in the middle of nowhere if you manage to drive on the highway without ever having to pass on the right.

I’m not butthurt. I’m just pointing out that you’re a moron since you clearly don’t understand what is happening in the video. Sorry if that offends you.

You’re clearly mentally challenged. The BRZ was hit at the 0:25 second mark. He doesn’t even begin accelerating after the Camry until the 0:36 second mark, and the clip ends at the 0:40 second mark. The only car that could close that gap in four seconds WOULD be a Koenigsegg. It’s also apparent from the audio that he…