StanSitwell
Stan Sitwell
StanSitwell

I am so enjoying this snark. Her stupid cat ears, and overtly sexy style whilst also being very childlike is simply gross. She has some talent, the sexy baby thing is unnecessary, but then, would we still be talking about her....

The douche who pulled the prank is being investigated for this and it's being treated as a felony. His twitter was taken down already.

They are sold out. Why are they sold out. I suppose it would be possible to just find tiny ornaments and just stick 'em on bobby pins.

Yet oddly you hit on the three ways to describe her. -_-

Diddy did it first:

Something to keep in mind. Approximately two percent of rape allegations made to police are false, according to various studies, including those cited by the U.S. Department of Justice. It's unknown what percent of rape allegations never reported to police, such as Jackie's, are false. That figure is not the

Girls can do that. It makes it totally okay if its a girl.

I think that she used her sister as a prop for her self-indulgent bullshit, yes. I think that she shared very personal stories about her sibling to generate controversy and attention. No way in my right mind would I ever masturbate next to my little sister and then put it in a book.

So calling her sister "sexual property" and dressing her up as a "biker whore," or the stuff she did while her sister was in her early teens: all of that is "normal in context?"

She looks so, so young for her age. I feel like I'm watching a 12 year old in really skimpy clothing :\

Kate you are being either dishonest here, or you are missinformed about the details of this story.

So, just to be clear, Breitbart's story turned out to be right, and Dunham's publisher agreed.

Sum up of this post:

Jezebel umad

thank you for posting this. i was wondering how jezebel would defend dunham's disgustingly careless and callous actions. now i know :)

Go Huskies

Dear Anna:

You would be glad to see that the Washington Post yesterday published an update in which it confirmed that Ms. Erdely did not talk to the accusers. As you have a Masters in Journalism from Columbia University, I am sure you will remember the introductory classes in which you were told to at least try to

Instead, I think, as I made clear above, that you're piggy-backing on the work of other people who are calling Erdely's story into question without a single shred of evidence.

What Anna leaves out is that I already wrote a story that presumed the allegations were true. Last week, I wrote that expulsion would not have been a sufficient punishment for the UVA rapists: http://reason.com/archives/2014/…