aI aRT wiLl dEmoCraTiZe cReatIvIty

DOES NOT COMPUTE!

Arguing with “AI” proponents is like arguing with chatbots. You countered one metaphor with another metaphor, and the damn thing is now having a “you introduced a paradox into its logic circuits” meltdown.

No, they would have artists on staff or freelance to do this, like all corporations with marketing departments have had, ignorant bootlicker.

“AI” “art” proponents are so up the ass of corporations and their slop-producing, infinite growth, anti-worker agenda, they think eradicating professional artists is some sort of tedious labor-reducing favor being done to them and human civilization.

“Why would there be no human-created art though?” asks the idiot techbro who replied to you, who literally thinks we’re saying no one would do art as a hobby, and not comprehending that that’s NOT GOOD IN A WORLD WHERE YOU HAVE TO SPEND MOST OF YOUR LIFE WORKING (except for the privileged few at the top who will be…

Unsurprisingly, the concept of jobs—spending most of your time making a living (to have money to buy food, pay for shelter, pay bills, pay for dependents, and some luxuries afterwards), and therefore not having time learn/make/improve at creating art by doing it for a living—is lost to techbro bootlickers like you who…

Imagine thinking that’s the main problem with “AI” “art”.

lol

“The irony of people on Kotaku whining about the technological advancement of humanity”

“Wasting tens of thousands of dollars to build expertise in something people don’t want and don’t need - which is why they aren’t paying you to do it”

Hey fucking bootlicking moron

This response was much funnier

Rickles was actually clever and funny.

Thanks, the Luddites were cool and correct.

It’s naive and shortsighted to accept shitty things being foisted onto us from the top-down as inevitable.

BUT THE PLOW ONCE REPLACED FARM GUY, AND ONE TIME CAMERA REPACED PAINTER GUY. SO WHO CARES THAT HUMAN NO MAKE ART! QED

bUt iTs tHE WaVe oF thE fUtuRe, jUst AcCePt It, DOn’t cOMpLaiN