All good except for this part:

If the company that made the alcohol could detect it was in the driver and stop the action of the alcohol then it would be the maker of the alcohol.

If someone gets drunk and kills someone while driving, who is at fault... the drunk driver or the company that made the alcohol?

You go after the person who was at fault, driving while texting. Hitting up Apple is a cash grab.

Yeah, Vancouver has amazing.......

Let’s assume that their position sensing by “scenery” actually works and isn’t buggy as hell...

Unless the phone is able to determine which seat in the vehicle it is being operated from, the fix (presumably disabling functions when speed exceed X) would disable all passenger iPhones as well.

You say that there is no meaningful way but what if their patent was able to make a meaningful way that would have worked? If they just sat on a patent (preventing others from making a meaningful way) does that make them liable?

The police force actively recruits psychopaths and bullies with low IQ on purpose.

A body cam might work better, the dash cam wouldn’t see to the sides.

some winter tires. They will make a RWD car accelerate better than most AWD cars, and certainly turn and stop better**

There was a CVT based F1 car back in the ‘90's, but it was banned before ever getting to race (was only tested). Apparently it was like 7 seconds faster per lap than other cars.

I think this makes Ford look weak.

Scion was never good... but they *could* have been if Toyota actually had the balls to make something compelling. Instead it became their slightly off-beige graveyard.

Did he break his hand from repeatedly punching the driver in the face?

While you’re at it, call out the Wright Brothers, too.

Do all cars really need 5-star crash ratings?

I like it.

How about a re-styled mustang, with a softer ride and quiet interior. Nicer materials inside as well. Then they could capitalize on the Mustang volume for parts and make an inexpensive, youth-oriented model.