I’m a customer but even I had to double take the title on this article because I was like “What’s a Max? Ooooh, oh, you mean HBO. Got it. Yeah no one calls it Max.”

JUST a second. I am Lord Kinbote of the Broogan Star System. WE have dibs on Earth. We put our quarter on this jukebox a long time ago. Granted it wasn’t a quarter but rather a Krinxnox, but it’s still currency. So back off. 

There was never a time when you could trust the government to do behave. It was just less bad than now. =)

Don’t forget scenario three: These are basic camera problems that people who understand aircraft optics know to be uninteresting.

Yep:

Dude. Almost all of this video evidence is more easily explained by camera dynamics than by “giant trans dimensional cover up.” Occam’s razor that crap.

re: Tic-Tacs.

One thing that no one seems to point out: The pilot never saw the thing with his own eyes, right? It was on a tiny 4x4 inch screen in his heads up display. I believe several analysis have been done on that video with almost everyone who knows anything about optics and advanced camera physics concluding…

It’s a song. It’s a song with a sentiment aimed at the people who do this kind of stuff:

Let’s be honest. The chances that this guy knew that the video was filmed at the site of a lynching are pretty low. To the set selector it was probably just a cool looking federalist style building.

Maybe let’s wait for the details. There’s a lot here that may or may not be meaningful. I’m happy to believe in corruption, but I also want to see its actually happening. 

Also worth noting there’s a bit of a difference between the two incidents mentioned. In the “Karen” one, the woman willingly scampers off the aircraft. In the earlier version, the young lady is stating that she is -not- going to go off the aircraft and continues the disturbance. 

I think one thing I’ve definitely learned in the last few years of everyone immediately jumping to freak out is: wait until there’s more direct access to evidence.

The level of physical force here appears utterly unacceptable, but also we’re primarily learning about this now through other people’s articles and without…

Epidemiologist don’t want you to know this one Tick Trick! 

More so, slurs are defined by the people who are offended, not by the people using them happily. I think we can all come up with a lot of words that are extremely taboo now which were “not considered slurs” just a few decades ago. This is the slippery slope of language policing.

It’s interesting what things you can get cancelled for and what things just get you to the next multimillion dollar franchise. 

That’s not how I read it. 

Folks, much as I disagree with their decision impacts, the court is NOT THERE TO DECIDE IF WETLANDS SHOULD BE PROTECTED, only where the authority to do so lies given our government.

Sounds like it would be good to have as an “Also” but not as a primary. I can imagine a situation in which something needs editing on the go, but it’s hard to think of a time when I would not have a laptop available to do the same thing. 

How accurate are flight simulators I wonder, and would they give you a chance if you were a big time flight simulator player? Just bringing this back to Geekery.

Yeah, it’s not bigotry if it’s aimed at a race or gender we don’t like. Right? White women can’t be part of a diversity conversation. It’s ok to paint a group of people with a derogatory label so long as we agree that we don’t like that group. These white women should just be quiet and know their place. Right…