They're slowly filling in the void of available vegan junk food. Example: Chicken-less Mandarin Orange Morsels at Trader Joe's. Soon we will have junk food equality!
They're slowly filling in the void of available vegan junk food. Example: Chicken-less Mandarin Orange Morsels at Trader Joe's. Soon we will have junk food equality!
The point I was trying to make is that it's about utilitarianism. It's about doing the greatest good. Animal factory farming on a grand scale, like what is happening around the world at ever-increasing rates, is not only environmentally unsustainable, but a terrible use of resources.
Ooooook. Why don't we all take a deep breath here. K? K. Moving on:
The problem is that there's sort of 2 arguments going on here: the animal rights argument and the animal welfare argument. Animal welfarists argue that we should basically be able to do whatever we want with animals as long as we treat them…
It's one thing if you rescue a shelter dog and train him to sit, but breeding animals for the specific purpose of human entertainment is pretty exploitative. There are thousands of dogs (and rabbits, etc.) dying in shelters, so we shouldn't be breeding any more or supporting industries that do.
First, it's a false dichotomy to say that women should either have their own porn or we should all just enjoy the different kinds of porn different people like. There's room for both.
But this strikes me as a very privileged point of view. It's like, "Well, why do you need your own porn? Why can't you just…
Couldn't you also say something like "main bedroom"? Then people would know what you meant. I feel like if I read "owner's suite" I would think that meant something different than just a bedroom, which I guess is fine for the upscale houses as discussed but otherwise might sound confusing/misleading.