Respectfully, if you guys have something specifically against Vogue then it would be great if you would just write up a big retrospective piece. The more you make this about Lena Dunham and effectively force her to respond to this—which no matter how you slice it is a direct discussion about her body that invites a…

Jez,

Admit it, Jez. You were wrong.

Actually, her twitter response was much better: "Way cooler when people do things out of pure blind spite than out of faux altruism". Faux altruism describes this whole shitshow perfectly.

Dear Editor,

such meta. very bush. yes. much hair.

"Think of my wife," he said. "Think of my kid."

BOOM.

"This is about Vogue, and what Vogue decides to do with a specific woman who has very publicly stated that she's fine just the way she is, and the world needs to get on board with that. Just how resistant is Vogue to that idea?"

Do not pass Go

Oh, come on. She's obviously full of shit.

Because without adults procreating, businesses will have no customers or employees in 100 years?

Why are we empowered when we buy a vibrator, but a man who buys a fleshlight is a 'lonely fuck'?

Nagasu's routine was almost flawless. I was sure she would make it. I think to say that she didn't make it because of her race is going a bit far though.

She lost because Wagner's record at international competitions over the past few years has been more consistent. If the roles and races were reversed, would you still be covering this as a massive injustice?

The only reason I would ever set foot on this thing is because of the tiny, very remote possibility that The Doctor will also be on it.

Check your high-follower-count privileges, yo.

Couldn't they have come up with a better name for their plan?