Just try youtube for K&P. I don’t really know anything about their episodes or the arc of the show because I’ve only seen various sketches, but they are brilliant. Often just weird, but in a fantastic way. This is one of my favorites:

You may have spent that much money on a 2.5 hour plane flight. I would MUCH rather go to Hamilton than sit on an airplane, no matter what destination.

How much money are you willing to bet on that theory?

Four convictions does not mean four separate incidents. This was kind of mentioned by someone above referring to a linked article. But in general it’s just very important to realize that someone could be convicted of four different felonies just for one act that they did. That’s how prosecutors roll.

I thought maybe the protest was going to be that it was [abstractly] a rather pornographically contorted woman’s body without a head.

Me too. One thing I keep in mind is that Jon Stewart’s show was abysmally sexist for its first many years. Only in the last few did he start to get it.

How is it extra cautious to shoot people?

I disagree that there is no good argument against them. The arguments in support of body cameras might outweigh arguments against them, but the concerns about providing police with even more ubiquitous surveillance of over-policed communities are real.

I don’t think it’s shrewd at all. They already made it perfectly clear that it was about politics. Now Obama should have picked someone that would have galvanized democrats to vote, and a person of color or a woman whom republicans would have looked extra bad stymying.

WTF OBAMA JHAVE YOU NOT LEARNED ANYTHING IN EIGHT YEARS?!?! You seemed like a sharp guy...

Yeah George Bush being a blithering idiot didn’t stop him from being actual president for 8 years....

Hopefully she doesn’t say anything but makes this face:

Do you mean ‘inspirational’?

Yes.

I don’t understand. This comment was much clearer than the original post. I have no idea what point the original post was even trying to make, much less any arguments in favor or against it.

Deferred action is also a decision not to deport someone, so that’s true. But that’s not the basis of the lawsuit, because the states don’t really have standing to challenge that decision, which is entirely a federal power. Whether the states who sued have standing even to challenge the deferred action and work permit…

Deferred action. Yes. But the legal question in that litigation is about providing a temporary administrative benefit - a work permit. It’s not about just declining to deport people, which Obama certainly hasn’t done, so it hasn’t been in the courts.

Nah, he could totally stop deporting people. What’s Congress going to do, pass a law? I’ll believe that when I see it.

Yes, because it’s about what issues they champion, what they fight for, more than just how they vote on issues that they aren’t driving. In this case, that seems to be pretty determined by gender.

I’m not sure about the ‘hidden’ part.