It's been deleted. Can you give us a general idea of what it was?

I get pretty sick of athletes grandstanding with their charity donations—a thousand bucks for every home run I hit! (Looking at you, Matt Kemp.) If the cause means that much to you, just donate the damn money and don't make it about you. Kevin Durant wins all the kudos today.

"I know this whole Gawker crew is pro-woman, but let me show you all that I'm a raging neanderthal."

Used it when I went to Spain, had a phenomenal experience. It was dirt cheap with an incredible location—right in the middle of the historic district, where it would have been hundred of euros a night. I basically had to apply to the owner and tell her about myself—who I was traveling, what I was planning on doing…

and god help you if you are an ugly girl
course too pretty is also your doom
cause everyone harbors a secret hatred
for the prettiest girl in the room

It's only one of the oldest and most persistent stereotypes of the DC area that everyone dresses the same, but sure, I guess it must be a new thing.

Good for you. It's possible that I'm not completely making things up.

The reason I phrased it the way I did is because I was trying to make it clear that I find this trend incredibly troubling. If there were a marker for bone cancer, would people go around getting legs cut off just because they had the requisite mutation? I don't give two shits about Angelina Jolie, what I care about is…

I guess I'm sorry you feel that way? But if I don't get a vote neither does anyone else, which makes every comment on here irrelevant. I guess we should stop the internet, then.

I feel like I need to reiterate this just in case I haven't been clear: I don't have a problem with her decision. Good for her, she made the decision that was right for her in consultation with her doctors. I take issue with the implication that this is the right choice for everyone or should the the universal…

Nothing that I posted is voodoo scare tactics either. A complete mastectomy is no guarantee that you won't get cancer. There's a difference between knowing your risk factors and encouraging other women to take a radical, unproven surgical step.

At the turn of the 20th century, treatment for breast cancer was developed by a surgeon named William Stewart Halsted, who became convinced that he had found the cure for breast cancer. His solution was a radical mastectomy, wherein he would take not just the entire breast, but the surrounding lymph nodes, underlying…

I understand that that's what she said in the article, but that it not correct. Having the mutation does not mean that you will get breast cancer, it just means your risks are higher. IT DOES NOT MEAN YOU WILL AUTOMATICALLY GET CANCER. Look, it's her body and she gets to do whatever the fuck she wants to with it, but…

That is so blatantly untrue. Everyone in the developed world is aware of breast cancer and the associated risks because of the pink-infused culture in which we live now. All Angelina has done is brought awareness to a radical, risky, expensive procedure that most women shouldn't have even with the gene mutation.

I don't find this particularly laudatory. Having a preventative mastectomy is a radical procedure, and one that women with very low risk of developing breast cancer having been turning to in droves in recent years. We've essentially reached a point where this is a medical fad for the wealthy: cut of your breasts…

Thank you for this, and apologies to Lindy for doubting her.

Holy fucking Christ, are you trolling your own blog?

Yup. Makes me think of this:

It's possible that the neighbors had convinced themselves those memories were real. Memory is incredibly susceptible to suggestion. So imagine you live two doors down and you know three women and a child were rescued and that three brothers were arrested. It's not hard to believe that sometime in the last 10 years,…

Good GOD, have you ever SPOKEN to a seven year old?