SecretAZNMan
SecretAZNMan
SecretAZNMan

Furaious your forgot the Mazda

Agreed, the 9-5 was a fine car. Auto enthusiasts with little to no experience with Saabs seemed to love hating on Saabs. I know. I was one. Then I took the plunge and got a 9-3 wagon. It's got a few rough edges, but is quite a lovable car that was actually ahead of its time.

I can tell you what I suggest from my ownership experience with an NC1.

Reminds me of the original Focus SVT. Those were the days. Simple, wholesome fun. Enough with the wannabe F1 technoholic overpriced hatches.

So sad. I had been remaining hopeful for a new owner of Saab to restart activities in the US, but these images are a startling reality. There's no ashes for anything to rise up from. The ashes have been swept up and scattered...by GM. The GM hate for blocking any salvation of Saab is running very high.

As opposed to TTAC which bans those who disagree with them... Such thin skin for being so prickly.

Let's take a look at some of their staff.

Mr. BS won't admit to any hidden agenda to his glee/malice. It's a pure business analysis and proliferation of "truth" according to him. It's a shame since some of their writers are quite good and entertaining.

TTAC is full of schmitt. Literally. Their head BS guy does nothing but twist and malign anything Saab related. If you call them on it, they act like babies and threaten to ban you. It's a tough time for Saab but even without Saab as a company, the community will eventually figure something out.

I take it back. I only see some Furai in the front. The rest of the Furai was melt your pants off hotttt. This is...nice.

Not bad, but I liked it better as the Mazda Furai!

I love my Canon SD4000 which has 720P and optical zoom. It didn't seem to get much love in the media nor much of an update.

So when does SAAB show what the real 9-3 replacement would have looked like? Many probably would like to know if they were getting their hopes up for good reason.

Agreed, the Transit is probably more space efficient than the E-Series. We'll have to wait and see what engine options become available (diesel?), but the Euro offerings sound pretty anemic for any type of towing or hauling. It's a small market, but some want to haul people AND tow gear so a pick up isn't always a

See dal20402 for why someone might want a V8 for a non asinine reason. True, not everyone needs a heavy duty van. The original comment is that some actually do need one. It's only asinine for someone to conclude that no one needs it.

Unbelievable. It's like replacing the F-Series with a Ridgeline type replacement. As archaic as the E-Series is/was, some people really want and need a V8/10 heavy duty body on frame RWD van. I guess they got rid of the Crown Vic, so nothing is sacred anymore.

Nice. I hope they shorten up that front overhang though. Oh, and keeping the metal accent leading to the headlights would be great too. They didn't really do that for the CX-5

In car SatNav. There's absolutely no reason they should cost so much.

Z4?