If a woman decided that my sexual history disqualified me from long-term relationship potential, that would TOTALLY be within her right.

I agree with Bill Clinton on this. And it's a common source of mockery from shows like The Daily Show.

Were I to get married? Sure.

"Just how do you determine what constitutes a "woman you fuck" vs the "type of woman you invest in emotionally" beforehand? Do you apply a "hot slut" algorithm?"

This is genuinely the dumbest thing I have ever read.

Ha, true that about the class of the participants in these videos.

Fair enough.

How are your judgements of what constitutes an ass less anymore arbitrary or personal than a man's judgements of what constitutes a slut? One person's asshole is somebody else's no-big-deal.

1) Ok, good point. Change 'every' to 'most', at the very least in my opinion.

Are you suggesting that good girls don't exist?

Fair enough.

Oh, bitter much?

I hate that stupid lyric. It's too simplistic. A much better version:

Nobody is really that intimidated by a women initiating things.

Every guy want's a good girl that's bad just for him, just like every girl want's a bad boy that's good just for her.

If they're hot enough to pull it off, then vulgar and trashy is a legit fashion choice.

My parents were always a little worried about this too for some reason. Like, when it came time to choose university, or time to choose where to work, they always made sure my decision wasn't being motivated by some girl they didn't know about that I was wide-eyed and in love with.

Part of the problem is that a not-insignificant number of women are all too happy to pass off their poor behavior on PMS when it suits them.

I guess not.

This looks genuinely terrible.