Seatosky
Seatosky
Seatosky

True. And as women become more and more vocal about their preferences for men's looks bodies, we may see fashion move in such directions.

You can. That's what I choose to do (or look away).

No you're right, the entire fashion industry is a Machiavellian shell game designed to shame and make people feel bad.

It IS amazing how some people respond to differing opinions with curiosity and the will to discuss instead of hilarious rage and snark.

Sure thing sweetie, you enjoy your little fantasies in place of actual male attention as much as you need. :)

You can remain cool and dress for your weight class. Nobody is saying they have to wear a snowsuit.

Honestly it seems like his heart is in the right place and his general understanding of some of the key aspects are there, but he is fucking TERRIBLE at articulating things.

What are sex object standards?

Long toned legs, flat tummies, pert breasts, round butts, etc?

I'm not policing anybody's body, because policing implies putting restrictions on what people can wear. I have no interest in that, I'm simply saying body-flattering is better than not.

Nobody is telling anybody what the have to wear or revoking anybody's right to wear what they want.

Spring fashion. She's doing it right.

I don't ever recall making the argument that they don't have the right too. I merely question the wisdom of it.

Deep breaths, buddy. It was a joke.

Neither sex should. Why not dress in a flattering fashion?

Uh... where did I say that men were exempt from my feelings re: dressing to your weight class?

Well, if they're gay it can't be argued their doing it to objectify women as sex objects.

I don't know what those words mean in that order, but what exactly is your problem with my comment?

I think so. She's objectifying a guy (I mean, he doesn't even have a FACE), why not poke fun at her for it?

As I pointed out in my post, it goes for both genders.

Oh please, you're oversensitive.