ScienceofLife
ScienceofLife
ScienceofLife

I think you're a bit confused. The article isn't praising Elizabeth for having great AI, they're praising her personality (ie writing). They don't say she has the best AI, they're saying she's the best AI companion; what they mean is she is well-written and AI controlled.

Five words killed Battlestar Galactica: "And they have a plan".

I found BSG to be great from start to finish and not to suck at all. It does not belong in this list. The episode where Starbuck plays the piano gave shivers to both me and my friends at the time.

Wonderfully said. I think a lot of what you said resides in the story. That Bioshock Infinite's team did a great job of showing the pitfalls of religion when people blindly follow (which often leads to fanaticism, hate, aka Comstalk) as opposed to those who actively engage, question, and improve upon their faith which

This was good read and very insightful. Thanks.

The game is set in 1912 USA. Of course there's going to be a heavy, forceful prescence of Christianity (or as close as they can get without getting the Christians all up in arms over it) as well as rascism. I don't get what the big deal is? They're altering History but they have to keep it true to the time period,

Thank you for posting a fellow Christian voice on this game. It was very well written IMO.

Bravo, Sir. Thoroughly thought-provoking, and I'd say accurate.

Great article. I may not agree with everything you wrote, but your ideas were well formed and I enjoyed it as a whole.

This was posted a while ago here on Kotaku around when you made that post about the Songbird plushie... not sure why you decided to delete that and repost this with a new link and big paragraph about how it wasn't a great shooter but everyone loved the story and lore =X

Seriously, the first sentence of your article is something that is just plain false. Maybe you aren't especially skilled at the game, (or, more likely, these articles are simply just trying to flame up page views) but don't present the article and the opening sentence as unobjectionable when it just isn't true.

Did Kotaku make an editorial decision that nobody working on the staff is allowed to like the combat in this game? It was praised pretty uniformly in reviews, and myself and many other people I have spoken too in person and online love it. In fact, through face-to-face interactions and online interactions with people

I thought the article you're linking to was drowned in enough "judging from what you wrote, you're bad at shooters, so don't say this game is a bad shooter" comments for you to NOT tote it as a flawless argument that it itsn't a good game.

LOL, the game has bad combat? Nice clickbait.

Ever since one person made the comment that the gameplay isn't that great everyone has since jumped on the bandwagon. I personally think it fits just perfectly within the game - same goes for all of the violence that was mentioned in a previous article.

Congrats Irrational....no one likes your game apparently? Should have just made a movie, instead of limiting your audience by making a video game....