ScaryMerry
ScaryMerry
ScaryMerry

That's sad. I'm not, though it might be different if there were more actually attractive male porn stars (or attractive to me, at least).

I just feel like in an article about technology, snarking on the models' appearances is kind of rude and uncalled for.

That doesn't mean that her body is public property. That's like saying you have the right to randomly punch a boxer because that's what they do professionally. It doesn't work like that, both with boxers and with porn stars.

Stoya is fucking awesome. I once got into a really weird conversation with a guy about favorite porn stars and I was like, "James Deen's my favorite guy and Stoya's my favorite girl, though for entirely different reasons."

Point of the article —-> O

It was originally published in the Harvard Business Review. http://www.business2community.com/trends-news/influence-and-michelle-obama-infographic-07613

People underestimate the style of a First Lady. A fabulous FLOTUS can have some serious clout and influence on the world and economy of fashion. Just look at the legacy of Jackie O, for example.

Shelly O is certainly doing her part to boost the economy, at least in the fashion industry.

Just gonna leave this here. 'Tis fascinating.

I feel it's worth mentioning that Vogue has some gorgeous editorial ads as well as a fold out on the front cover that has a 1949 cover and the magazine's first cover. I now have 30+ pages torn from the magazine plastering my walls. Eyecandy abounds.

YES. It's part of why I've yet to upgrade it. Plus, I have the unrestricted 3G one.

It's not backlight that causes eyestrain so much as glare.

Know what I'm getting for Christmas.

I'm one of those people- I grew up in conservative Baptist churches in the south in the Bible Belt and my father is a very conservative Republican. However, I, unlike the Dugger children, also went to public school, had unrestricted access to the internet, read pretty much anything and everything I wanted, and watched

I actually don't wear heels very often outside of dancing (I ballroom dance). I'm a student teacher and I'm on my feet most of the day, so I opt for nice flats instead. And most of the nice clothes that I wear aren't formal dresses- they're retro-inspired professional clothes. Think Joan Holloway and Betty Draper, and

Given that dressing the way I dress makes me feel confident and fabulous and ready to face the day, then yes, it is for me. If I care about anyone's opinion regarding my clothes other than myself, I'm more concerned what other women and gay men think than straight men, as straight men rarely seem to appreciate fashion

Whose to say women dressed nicely aren't comfortable? Dressed nice ≠ uncomfortable. I love fashion and make my own clothes and very rarely "dress down". Life is too short and full of fabulous clothes for that. I'm far more uncomfortable stepping outside in sweats than I am dressed to the nines. Dressed to nines, I

I don't dress up for men. Day-to-day, I dress up for me. I dress in a way that makes me feel confident and fabulous, not to attract a man. The fact that everyone seems to assume that people are dressing for the gaze of the opposite sex instead of for themselves is profoundly annoying.

This is interesting, and I wonder how any of it relates to how guys see me (which is actually not something I obsess over, but is a somewhat foreign subject to me since I have very few straight male friends). I don't do "casual". Casual for me is a bit dressed up for most people, since I have the philosophy that life

Yep. Basically. It really is our version of the f-bomb. Whether we mean it you say "fuck you" or "you're fucked", it works either way.