SUSPECT__IS__HATLESS
SUSPECT__IS__HATLESS
SUSPECT__IS__HATLESS

Ugh, because he knows not to do that shit to famous people, and they can be like "Omg, Terry? NO. He's not like that! He's great!" I once had a beloved professor who was accused of inappropriate behavior with women who were in his plays. I couldn't believe it because he was so wonderful and normal in class. Now I am a

sorry about your limited knowledge about human psychology but being unable to react is common behaviour for humans in a situation of traumatic experience.

Terry isn't going to be booted by the fashion community until there's enough internet outcry. The more testimony, the more disgusted I become, the more I relish his downfall like a maniac. Callie B! You've become a favorite at Jezebel~ You willing to take him and the publications that hire him on more than Jenna was

So, Richardson apologized because she had a boyfriend and he might have offended this said boyfriend? Uuuuughhhh!

Why is anyone still working with him?

Yes, same here. With a flat iron it really takes just ~5-10 second pass for each smallish section I do (with around 18 sections), compared with a curling iron which takes 10x longer and can't handle larger sections of hair, let alone my entire length of hair. A decent flat iron really helps, though.

EXACTLY!!!

A lot of this doesn't just apply to couples.

I've found that looking at your partner as exactly that (a partner for life, hopefully), it just smooths things along. Don't expect your partner to be telepathic, don't be an asshole and be considerate. "Happy wife, happy life" is a crock of shit guys, and that comes from a divorcee I know who's ex-husband was very

I thought *everyone* knew this—my hair isn't long enough for the tendrils shown in the picture but I always use a flat iron to give my hair a little curl under—only older women use an actual curling iron

I don't work "in an academic environment"; I work in a mf life sciences research institute as a research scientist.

My issue isn't with suggesting that someone was or was not nominated for a Nobel, but the entire claim of someone subsisting without nourishment for an extended period of time. Which is complete

This is all very nice and all very irrelevant.

You claimed that this scientist observed a man strictly (whatever that means), witnessed that the person didn't eat or drink for 6 months and didn't publish ONE article about this medical marvel? And didn't bring any other scientists to corroborate this story? Really?

Exactly. I can't even manage to straighten my hair lol

I want to do this so much, but there's no way I can do that on my own head backwards in a mirror.

Here's why I don't believe you.

If your primary observation supports a hypothesis that contradicts all known physiology and basic cell biology, the next step is not to believe it but to assume you fucked up the experiment. And repeat it. A LOT. If you still keep getting the same result, then you would assume there is a simpler explanation, like the

Well, then, obviously because you grandparent was a competent and fairly well respected leader in his scientific field (something about penises, right?) then as soon as he performed this easily reproduced experiment in a carefully controlled lab setting and got results that completely controverted the entire body of

I work at McDonald's, I cook the food and make the burgers.

I mean, I know this is several hours later, but I am very interested in some nachos.

Well then. No.