The LFA's design has a lot of subtle harmonies. The side grill openings echo the vanes in the mirrors, for example.

You're crazy. '90's MOPAR concepts are some of the best! That first 300 was essentially a Fisker minus the awful grille.

I don't see a single proportion that's shared. Not even the DLOs are similar; the AM has a more similar proportion to the Mustang than the Accord.

Like this looks the same too, eh?

I'm hoping it's more greenish. Magnetic looks a bit brown, but it could be grey as well.

I thing Ford is going to follow the iPhone strategy.

Mid-cycles with new drivetrain options limit the amount of things to fail/recall, and keep the car in enthusiasts' minds.

Wouldn't be surprised if the Coyote got forced induction as well on option above the GT. The supercharged 5.0 block Ford makes for Jaguar puts out…

The rear fenders, and even the front fenders, are very similar to the 10-14s, with bigger wheels. The biggest change, though, is blacking out the b pillar, in effect extending the glasshouse, a la Aston Martin.

Eh. Strange to say but I suspect the Ford may be lighter this time around.

Sat in one too at Woodward this year. There are a lot of good elements but a) it has a somewhat sterile, anodized feel to me; and b) the proportions are off, specifically the ratio of glass house to the body from the side is about 5-10% off.

It sounds paradoxical how something can be both sterile and over exaggerated,…

There should be some Godwin's Law of internet car design discussions about the Ssangyong Rodius. Point taken.

Yes on everything but the Jag. Nothing's near the F at $65, and nothing's near the F R (one of the 3 cars in my dream garage) at $100.

Yup. Let's see how they're doing reliability-wise when Ford rolls out the mid cycle refresh.

True. But the 3.7 block is the reason the F150 fares so well on Consumer Reports' reliability rankings. I'm not so keen on beta-testing the first generation of a high hp/displacement FI block from an American manufacturer, not at least until it's proven itself. And I think the Southern States wouldn't necessarily…

But you'd leave Jennifer Anniston for Angelina Jolie any day. (And that was before she started aging).

Would have a Cayman base. Or save up an extra year for an F Coupe. It's not a dream car if I don't dream of it.

It is a good engine, no doubt about it. I really, really like it. But the rest of the powertrain is cost-cut to maximum damage.

The auto doesn't hold park without a half-foot roll, and I swear the "adaptive" (yeah, right) transmission software map is designed to pick out the one gear I don't want in any scenario. And…

It's a cheap, thrifty, reliable, good piece of machinery. The V6/I6 is a soldier.

As a current 3.7 6AT driver, the lack of torque and atrocious transmission mapping dampens the fun to be had.

The C7 is like that pretty girl at the bar, but all of her friends vastly outshine her. It's the Jennifer Anniston of cars.

I don't think they'll go that absurd - the V6 is part of Mustang history.

I think it'll be the base model with the turbo four the mid-ranger.

It has not won any design awards.