I find it fascinating that after the consumer reaction to Sony v. Microsoft, publishers nor Microsoft want to take responsibility for this whole DRM fiasco.

Anyone else confused as to why the obvious choice *Clefairy* isn't part of that line up lol

Killer Instinct is also going to be free to play with only 1 character available, and you need to buy the rest.

Sony has NOT always had awesome commercials, never forget the original PS3 commercials, they were awful.

I've been waiting for Red Wedding references all night!

Thats what happens when you listen to industry analysts and not gaming blogs.

Probably not much, Gamespot actually had a very good article a few months ago (here) on how Nvidia didn't want to work with Sony on the price they were asking but AMD actually took the deal. Judging from this E3 looks like AMD bet on the right horse, but that's just my opinion.

Indeed, but honestly if this has been the only piece of bad news from Sony for E3, then by all other regards they hit the grand slam with games, price point, consumer rights, and a good ol' xbox jab.

It's not that you can't say that, you just can't say it in public cus well, it sounds rapey. English is funny like that. As a good friend Adam Orth once said, Deal with it.

You sir have won E3 MEME of the Year award.

You see what they did there?

You're right they don't but that's why perception is important. If MS releases a subsidized model in which you're locked in to Live for 2 years then it might look more attractive to people. Just like not many people actually pay $700 up front for their iPhone, many people might not want to pay $500 up front for the…

Will there be a $599 Xbone that has a monocle on the kinect and lights my cigar?

Money. Publishers prefer to work for money.

Much more than that, they're giving away 6 free games just this month alone.

No ones credit card info was actually stolen, everything was encrypted. And it's only better because of cross game chat but that's about it and PS will have that this generation so your point is moot. For the greater part of a decade you guys having been paying a toll to access features that come free for everyone…

You do realize that most people keep their cable box on anyway right so it's really not such a hassle as you would like to make it seem. You seem to really want to believe that not having to press a few extra buttons is worth $400.

You are right on point man. It's not their money. It's OUR money. They aren't entitled to it just because they put out the game. I bought a used copy of Assasins Creed 3, 2 months after launch for $30 bucks I still haven't even finished it, and that was a few months ago already. It just now went on sale on PSN for $30…

This might sound a little cynical, but I just don't believe a publicly traded corporation; Microsoft or Sony will even bother to compete in the marketplace and make games cheaper. I'm pretty sure they'll just keep it as profit. Steam is owned by Valve, a corporation but a private one, one that doesn't have to report…

Am I the only that didnt recognize that scyther right away?