Scribblenauts is in the wrong and so is EA. EA isn't just taking the model and leaving it open to interpretation, they are taking the model and the trademark without even bothering to broker an agreement with the trademark holders.

EA could throw all the money they want at litigation it still doesn't mean they can use the name and model of guns and not pay, the trademark holder and the potential licensee need to come to some sort of agreement, patent & trademark law would fall apart if everyone did what EA is trying to do.

This is an IP issue, regardless of how you feel about the NRA, gun manufacturers, at the end of the day they have a right to be properly compensated for the use of their weapons or vice versa, they pay EA to represent their weapons. What you can't do is rip off someone elses work and then cry foul.

Why do they have everything to lose? They have everything to lose by not fighting it. Regardless of how you feel about guns or their manufacturers they have a legal right like every other creator of a brand to protect their IP. EA wants to turn a profit off of the realistic representation of their brands. And with EA…

Mike Fahey, never write a piece on pokemon ever again, you clearly don't have enough knowledge on the topic if you believe by different forms, people are referring to evolutions.

Well your answered your own question, in the "States" driver's licenses aren't a nationally issued identification, they are issued by the states and the states decide the rules in issuing driver's incenses.

They clearly didn't learn from EA's attempt to make Medal of Honor, a testing ground for what people would like in Battlefield. But Disney does have an advantage here. Battlefront 2 is a distant memory for many people, and outside of the hardcore gamer base, it's quite easy for casual gamers to be drawn to a new I.P,…