Roz
Rosewater
Roz

To criticize does not necessarily require the ability to create.

I have a theory that this practice stems from the historic view that women should be more neotenous in mind and body than men. Women are expected to be more immature than men, to be weaker emotionally, to care about things which society considers frivolous, and to be shallow. To be children, basically. And this is

You've been taught that a person's state of body is somehow an accurate reflection of their state of mind. This is not true.

THE FUTURE… IT IS GOOD!

I think they're saying that there is no clear line between mentally healthy and mentally ill.

"Legally change your name as soon as you can."

They're also asking about gender identity fyi.

BE STILL MY BEATING HEART.

At least they were courteous enough to put it in different keys.

But that's not necessarily "modesty". That's just dressing how you want and in your case in a way that Society subjectively deems worthy of respect and admiration. Calling it "modesty" makes it seem like you accept the status quo where people who dress like you are given conditional respect and women who dress in

Feminism: the radical idea that women are people

1. Subjective

I disagree. I feel that a person could just have easily made that argument about showing ankles in the 17th Century. I think that it's not the fault of the person showing a body part or piece of clothing if a person has a problem with it—it's theirs. Sight is the least intrusive sense and those feelings are almost

"BE SURE TO DRINK YOUR OVALTINE"

Nobody is forcing you to lose weight and wear makeup. That is your choice."

Yes. Yes they are.

So Hitler was like Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, right?

The KKK wasn't around before slavery was abolished. Hate movements always arise in the face of new social equality.