Oh yeah, I wasn't saying that our bodies definitely exist—that's why I put "in some way or another"; I meant that our thinking exists so there must be some vehicle.

@Furious_Liver: I may not be understanding you completely, but I don't see how we can assume that the "greatest possible being" has to be all-powerful. This is where Proposition 1 seems to be flawed. I'm fine with defining God as the greatest possible being, but can you safely assume that the greatest possible being…

@TF: Well, I think "Cogito ergo sum" is a pretty straightforward proof that we exist in some form or another.

@Vladimir Byazrov: It's coming this summer most likely.

@mywillisdone: I think the opposite would happen. People would eat more sugary and more fattening foods (perhaps without knowing it) to compensate for the diminished taste.

@Ophuk: What if they were able manipulate time so that from your kids point of reference zero time had passed but you had spent a few years there. Would you then?

@collex: I can see the headlines now. "New Moonwater!"

@cobaltage: Your latter example seems to resemble an intellectual hierarchy of sorts.

@crashedpc /sarcasm: "Will the answer to my ominous, italicised question every be found!?!"

Oh, I know, I didn't mean to discount that demographic; I just meant for me personally.

If this isn't nerd-porn, I don't know what is. (Except perhaps if it was Kari)

The colouring and the white-tipped tail coming out of its ball-shaped form reminds me of when Tails is in ball-mode

Mostly because I don't think people will use it that much more than they would the paper and because it wastes more energy to have an iPad for every Apple product.

Well, I do like gadgets :P, but this seems a tad excessive. It does exactly what paper does (perhaps one or two more functions), people use it just as much once the wow factor wares off. It just wastes more energy for the sake of looking fancy.

It's Tails!

@Odin: "The cat is putting its paws over its eyes and the caption reads 'I haz a sad'"

I prefer good old paper

@Christian LarsenFaen: I still wouldn't eat it because the process to make it is probably incredibly inefficient. Not to mention the chemicals that they must be using at the moment. And, it still has all of the health detriments of regular meat.

My mistake, I misread. I don't worship anybody, I simply think that the man is a great scientist. Moron is a strong word to call the most influential evolutionary biologist of the past half century imo. I wouldn't call any man or woman who respects strict scientific guidelines in their discourse to be a moron. At…

@deafblindmute: And Darwin's On the Origin of Species wrapped in the other hand.