Is the Mikhail Lermontov reference intententional?

No, you?

No. She should have articulated why her economic policies and philosophies of governance are better than her opponents.

That’s the sort of simple approach that will doom the left to failure for decades.

So 1/3rd of Latino voters? 54% of college educated voters, 11% of black voters, 52% of union workers, 25% of Obama voters and your conclusion is they all must be racist?

Yes you are; however, they make up a small percentage of the 63 million voters who supported him. Characterizing them as his base is going to (continue to) lead to failing political strategies and lost elections.

You are creating a boogyman. You cannot politically defeat an opponent when you don’t understand who the opponent is. Hint: it’s not these guys.

It’s not trumps base. It’s like .003% of Americans. Based on voter data, Trumps base was college educated whites whom 25% of voted for Obama (twice).

I don’t think this is a new phenomena. Nazi assholes have been marching openly in the US my whole life.

You’ve never heard “British Columbia, the Best Columbia?!”

It a dumb argument because I could one up you by saying the whole damn thing was under US command. But that would look like an attempt to diminish the actions of the Brits and other nations.

You guys broke the Gothic Line in Italy (BC Dragoons). Don’t sell yourselves short.

The reason you often hear that the American’s “saved” Europe is because they are not a European nation. It was a completely expeditionary effort and some still argue, not necessary for the US’s own interests. Largely, it was the US holding up its end of an alliance. Without the US contributions, the UK does not…

Lumping the Brits, Canucks and Aussies as a “Commonwealth” Army is cheating. The US provided the most Soldiers, followed by the Brits, then Canadians, then Australians.

I don’t think your assumptions are all that likely. You particularly overstate Russia’s expeditionary capability at the time. They had a massive land army that was powerful, yet horribly outdated. Consider the lack of naval and air power combined with very limited logistical capability to merely provide fuel, food…

Any where you have submarines or a carrier strike group, you have nukes. California, Hawaii and Japan for sure.

They missed US missile sites in Greece as well.

Nike missiles are anti aircraft; not nuclear. They exist to shoot down Soviet long range nuclear bombers.

Fake news.

No max contract player is going to want it go to OKC. They are going to end up giving a max contract to a B player.