RolandHTGunner
RolandHTGunner
RolandHTGunner

They have two satellites in space. The capability to launch a payload into orbit isn’t far from the creation of an ICBM. Do they have a one currently, debatable. To the possess the capability to put a warhead into orbit and then bring it back down—yes.

Give it time. They have no incentive to overproduce.

Really? There are multiple charging lots in my city that are designed to work with a variety of brands. Currently, they have outputs for Tesla and GM but I’m sure they’ll add more. Couldn’t tell you where a Tesla owned station is, I only see the generic ones.

A bit pedantic. F and C existed long before that. I think those vehicles still exist.

No. Ten years or so is when you start with semi major repairs... radiator, altinator, nothing too serious.

No. The 2GR-FKS debuted in 2015 in the Lexus 350 GS. First used in a Toyota badge in the 2016 Taco.

They look at repairs per 1000 vehicles. Then break it down by drivetrain, electronics, suspension, etc. The new 3.5 engine was not ready for prime time and has the highest repair rate of any new vehicle (same goes for the 4Runner).

GM’s Colorado/Canyon depreciation is only slightly behind the Tacoma. The Silverado actually holds value better than the Tundra. Also, that new Tacoma was rated worst in class for reliability by CR.

Twice bitches!

Does it matter that the German government basically demands that we keep troops there as a deterance to Russia? Should they be a bit linient on the stupid crap since we basically double their defense capabilities—again something our treaty requires of us.

Meh. We are there because our NATO obligation to Germany requires it. If Germany’s treaties with the US require the stationing of US Soldiers inside Germany as a defense/deterance force, than the German government should respect our culture as well.

Uh, the US, Canada and Britain still use TOW missiles; however, the TOW IIB which is still in service isn’t the same as the ones from the 80's.

We are in Europe as part of our NATO obligation. We would need to renegotiate our NATO role in order to totally pull out.

Depends on the size of the bomb. A “small” nuclear bomb akin to the one used on Hiroshima would only have minor effects north of the DMZ. Mainly cross contamination though animal migration and possibly wind (unless they account for this in the attack) but nothing too serious. A larger, hydrogen bomb would certainly

Canada did make nukes in partnership with the USA and U.K. In 1945.

Your life must be difficult

I’d party with her.

It was an “I can see Russia from my house” moment for Gore. You’ll never convince people that he didn’t take credit for the internet just as most people attribute the Russia claim to Palim.

Mass shootings have been on the decline since the 1930s. We are taking care of the problem.