Except they have to rehearse and certify on sling loads anyway. So whether its a stuck HMMWV or a shipping container in a field for training, the pilots and crews got their work in. Also flight hours are required. Most the time the pilots are just flying around performing various maneuvers to log hours. Sometimes…

No one in the military calls them “hummers.” That started with crappy hollywood action movies and then it caught on with civilians.

Because you drive the vehicles you have. USAF Security Forces are deployable units therefore they are equipped with vehicles that you can take into a combat zone.

But none of those things are inherently socialist.

And Canada exercises little control in the management of both humans and industries. They have social programs, but as a nation, they don’t follow the socialist economic model.

Fair enough. Good chat. I’ve probably spent too much time already discussing SUVs.

Of course, but AWD performs better than 4WD under most conditions. Just refuting your argument against the Sienna.

Neither does the 2017 Durango. AWD drivetrain.

What am I missing? Dodge’s site lists all versions of the 2017 Durango as have in AWD or RWD... not selectable.

True, but AWD is superior to 4WD on pavement, dirt, ice, snow and rain. 4wD is really only superior in mud and rock.

Here’s how seat usage breaks down:

Sienna comes in AWD and would be far more comfortable for 8 adults.

You should really look into an Odyssey.

Smaller than a RAV4 and car and driver recommends people 6 feet tall avoid the Durango in your link.

Neither Sweden or Canada are socialist. In both countries, the lion share of GDP is generated through privately owned business and industry within a free market capitalist system.

Canada is far from socialist. In fact, they are arguably more free market than the US. They have one major socialized industry and about 10,000 free market driven ones.

No. That’s socialism. Communism is where the income generated through government owned industry is evenly distributed to all people, not just the employees of said industries.

All three of those countries have a capitalist economic systems. The government does not run the major industry. Just because they have social program, it doesn’t make them socialist. Sweden is particularly capitalist.

North Korea has a good sized navy. Over 50 submarines, many of which are advanced by today’s standards. They have destroyers and other warships as well.

South Korea is a Christian dominant nation in case you skipped East Asian geography.