60% would keep people from investing altogether. It would destroy nearly every market. Can you imagine what kind of interest rate you’d have to get (or pay, if you are the lendee) if you factored in a 60% tax? No one would buy stocks, mutual funds, CDs, currency, commodities or any other traditional investment if the…

Jesus. Companies don’t grow by laying off employees or treating them like crap.

I don’t think that’s the argument he’s making. He’s saying that when people invest earned income, generate a return, and pay capital gains taxes, that original investment was still earned.

And as the #1 selling SUV in that segment, it’s clearly competitive.

Which it is.

But your using a single issue, that is a matter of opinion, to dismiss the Tahoe entirely. You want a bigger third seat, got it. Hundreds of thousands of buys don’t or don’t care.

It’s not that easy for a country like NorK. Western powers with satellites, sonar stations, long range reconnaissance flights and intelligence sharing with allies, sure. NorK is limited in all those areas. The US didn’t have to fool the world, just an isolated state that has been known to use CNN as its primary source…

My numbers came from CR. Your stats supported my post and are slightly different but still show the Tahoe being larger in the first two rows, smaller in the third with more space overall. Dude, I dont even own an SUV. I kinda think they are poor at everything, even the SRT/Hellcat/minivan with a lift models. Slow,…

Not really. What is quantifiable is that the Chevy has 6 more inches leg room in row one, 4.5 more in row two, and 5 less in row 3 (but a larger rear cargo area) I guess it comes down to the buyers needs. FYI the Durango actually has a larger wheel base than the Tahoe (119" to 116"), I think you called it smaller…

Again, you don’t know what is true and what is not. The US has 11 Carrier Strike Groups. One of which, The USS George Washington, is stationed in Japan. Its plausible that there is an “armada” (an extremely vague term) near the sea of Japan and therefore within strike of NoK. The Carl Vinson was significant because it…

Is it totally false? Aren’t parts of the Vinson strike group speculated to be in the North Pacific while the carrier itself is in the Indian Ocean?

If it’s objectively true. You must have data, quantifiables and peer reviewed research to suppor this claim. It sounds like opinion to me.

Probably mostly includes PAs, RNs and specialists like X-ray techs. Doctors have an MD which is more years of schooling and wouldn’t factor into a masters degree study.

Musicals

It’s difficult for a nation with limited reconnaissance capabilities such as NoK. The oceans are pretty large and our ships are relatively quiet.

This is called information operations and the military has an entire career field dedicated towards it. They develop themes and messages to have a desired effect on the enemy. Lying is part of it and its deliberate. Bluffing is probably a more accurate description. Every administration has participated in it to one…

I’d say the difference between below average in mechanical and power train quality for the Durango and above average for the Tahoe is more than significant.

Perhaps it’s FCAs well below average (and GMs above average) reliability ratings by outlets like JD Power and Consumer Reports.

We couldn’t have done it without using nukes. Patton was advocating nuclear strike.

Don’t forget Mitch Haniger!