Yes. He was charged as a civilian. You cannot apply the UCMJ to a civilian. Now, as I’ve said, it is possible to recall a retiree to active service and then charge under the UCMJ. You cannot apply the UCMJ to a retired (ets or otherwise) without first going through the recall/reappointment process. The administration…

It’s a discussion. No one is trying to win. 10 years as a JAG is what I bring to you. I’m not wrong about the reappointment of a GO.

Maybe I’m not being clear enough. As I’ve stated twice, an active duty recall of a GO requires congressional confirmation for re appointment. Yes, its legally possible, but is rarely done. It’s also up to the DOJ and not the DoD to initiate the recall. Obamas DOJ pursued civilian charges rather than go through the…

Don’t be a dick.

To answer your extradition question, no, not really. You are either in the military and subject to the UCMJ or not. General Officers are unique in that their appointment takes congressional approval. Therefore, to bring a retired GO back onto active duty would have to go to a congressional vote. Additionally, military…

Yes, but he was already retired by the time he was charged. The conviction came on “improperly storing classified material” because of the notebooks he maintained in his home office. He wasn’t convicted in the Broadwell leak.

He should have known better; however, he wasn’t subject to the UCMJ at the time the offenses were committed. He was already a civilian.

“National security stuff.”

I mostly agree on the storyline. I found it interesting but maybe a little bit of an afterthought. But I found the game play incredibly immersive. I felt as if I actually was Marston rather than playing a character.

I think your taking this personally or something.

You are looking at MSRP. Toyota doesn’t play the rebate game like the other manufacturers do. Nissan does. I had an 05 Frontier back when this model was new. It was $8,000 cheaper than the comparable Tacoma with better performance in every category. Paid $26,000 for an upper trim 4x4.

I think that’s perception and not reality. Maybe with the 1/4 ton segment (Tacoma). My 2015 Silverado bed is about one inch higher than my dads 1980's Scottsdale. Both are stock, 4x4; mine has slightly larger tires which is probably the difference.

The big horizontal lines they have on the F150 and super duties are what’s makes them ugly to me. The way they penetrate the headlights but just sort of “float” within the grille.

The Frontier is almost as reliable and significantly cheaper than the Tacoma. Also outdoes the Taco in HP, towing, and payload with about the same fuel economy.

Chevy isn’t making an aluminum bed truck. They’d are making aluminum body with steel bed. They also have a patent forward for a composite bed.

Dakota is a mid sized truck. F150 is full sized. 1/4 ton vs 1/2 ton. Of course the rear axel and suspension is larger on the bigger truck.

“Real trucks that could tow and haul...”

The Dakota is a different class of truck. Of course the smaller framed, lower suspension truck is going to be shorter than its full sized brother.

Do you hate that they are defying gender roles but not making the 1st Lady the nation’s housewife?

I thought the production value, framing, sequencing, and script were awful.