Those glasses are for the sun enthusiast who still wants to see without getting tan lines around his eyes. Marvelous!

Looks like he’s mouthing “I didn’t do it,” to me.

The Baja is actually stuck in this picture.

So wide...

Ugh, that’s the goal with my new ride...

The catch, though, is you have to put your mom’s soul into the car in order to drive it

Doesn’t meet minimum Ram requirements to Ram Ram. Ram wins.

RIGGITY RIGGITY REKT

*Looks at article content. Looks at date of article.*

“Don’t trust me.”

Over powerful? No. Maybe if they put the M4/3’s S55 in there, then maybe.

No, I know what you meant, but I took it and manipulated it to suit my response . The lecture was not required. It’s been what I’ve been saying from the start about the Mazda generating good amounts of power at low rpms, which brings into question why this whole discussion happened. And no, you really don’t understand…

Go back and take a class. You can’t even peel the onion correctly. Time... not rpms hahaha.

That’s for the 2003 model. Huge improvements after ‘05 you say? Hmm...

Murano 0-60 is 7.5: http://media.caranddriver.com/files/nissan-m…

And?

I don’t have a live axle car, though.

Cool, it was a cvt I’m guessing? Where did it rev to when you floored it? It must’ve had a specified rev range to keep the engine when you floored it. Where?

For shits and giggles, you should drive a car with a cvt transmission sometime, floor it, and see where in the revs the car goes to for max acceleration. Hint: Peak horsepower. Do you also consider amps to be a unit of power and watts a derivative of math?

No way to make you dumber, RPMs. That’s your new name, by the way. Not time. RPMs.