ReaveyBeach
ReaveyBeach
ReaveyBeach

I just... can’t... get... behind... it.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: They have moved so far away from what Assassin’s was that they’ve now ended up closer to The Witcher 3.

I can’t even call Kassandra or Bayek “assassins.” They’re just... really skilled soldiers. The assassination techniques and

They’re unfocused, repetitive, and mechanically shallow.  And the writing is perfunctory at best. 

I think this series has gone way to far off the rails to be saved.

Damn, it must suck to be an artist in 2019 when any of your artwork can be seen as “offensive”.

mmmmMMMMMmmmmmmmmm....

The show had declined in quality since diverging from the books, but the end of the Night King really tarnished the entire series. The build up of the white walkers over the last seven seasons seems wasted as does the lore behind them. I’m not sure what the point of Bran was except to tell John who he was & to get a

I’m interested to see if anyone has good counterpoints to this. I’m all for inclusiveness, but sports are designed around physical things—especially MMA—and there’s a reason why men and women are separated into different leagues for most of them. I’ve yet to hear an argument against it beyond, “they’re women, so they

Never been a fan of Rousey. Don’t like pugilism and she is a crime against acting.Having said that, as much as hate to agree with her, she is right about the transgender fighter.

how many of the developers are white nationalists

So it’s like a prettier, slightly less janky Chivalry?

It amazes me how many people don’t understand that the Night King is not what Game of Thrones is about.

Counter Argument: Fortnite is still not interesting to watch, like most Battle Royale games.

Oh no. What a monumental loss.

I really like the Joe Chill Night King face more than the current Night King face. The one pictured just seems more stately and smooth, like walking smoke out of a dream. The other’s just some guy.

Whoa, settle down with those timely references, Dad! You might cut yourself on their sharpness.

No, because re-cutting movies so that they play in a different order than the director intended is an almost impossibly stupid thing to do.

So what you’re saying is, Nolan took a straightforward narrative and made it a gripping masterpiece by editing it in a certain way?

...except, it isn’t, because that’s not possible. It’s 3 largely independent stories that can’t be put into a straight narrative. Which is why the structure is a neat trick that lets those 3 stories be told concurrently.

And it’ll be shot on Imax, and I’ll be traveling three goddamn hours to see it in 70mm.  

And I’ll bet that whatever it turns out to be, some shitbag will be in the comment section telling me it’s not that smart and not really all that great.