Raso719
Raso719
Raso719

No I agree. Anti-consumer is till anti-consumer even if consumers still want it and especially if they are uninformed or misinformed about the policy. I know it's a little bit more complicated than that but I think that, in essence, any policy that gives the consumer the short end of the stick (even if it comes with

Wow. So until the player gives them an emotion they're just this blank, emotionless slate? That's a total disconnect. IF you give the player that much freedom there's little point in bothering to display emotion when you can make a character act all bipolar and random.

I'm not following. Please elaborate, you have my attention.

We want to stop filling land fills that ruin the environment. Take this pamphlet and throw it away because that's totally helping.

I guess it's not anti-consumer if consumers actually want it. Is that like a form of Stockholm syndrome or is it perhaps an entirely different phenomena?

So is the fact that Superman has always been "better" than all of this finally starting to weigh heavy on people to the point that we have to make him more "believable" by turning him into someone as petty as we are? Or will we find out that old Sups is maybe being influenced by some dark power and so it's not really

I don't get it. Why would you invest so much into trying to mimic photo realism and all of the subtle nuances of the human face then every time you show off the character show them with these dead and emotionless faces. If it were not for the prompts in that images I would have no clue what the emotions being

"So I was talking to my BFF Jillaaaaa and I she was like "hey giirrrrrrrl what's with the glasses?" and I was like "so I can see your awesome new lipo you slut" and she was all like "bitch step off!" and I was all like "No way bitch" and she was all like "Yes way bitch" so like now we're not even friends

Some would argue that's "part of the game". That using abusive language to intimidate your opponents and to get them riled up is a fantastic tool to have at your disposal. But those people are ass holes and we should judge them as such for being ass holes and allow them to enjoy all of the social ramifications that

Ever notice that when ever someone offers suggestions on how consumers can work with in a system to legally attain free goods or suggest that people who offer goods and services should consider more or better sales that there is this faction that comes out of the wood work and starts bitching at you for trying to save

They're running Half Life 3 on this computer as we speak and they are laughing at us.

I think if rather than making the whole thing spin it alternated which barrel emitted a beam you could increase the gun's endurance and slow the rate of over heating each individual lens. Also, the extra juice might be able to go towards making the beams a little more powerful.

The glider almost reminds me of the one from Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind!

I really want to see Birdo as a playable character. I think he/she/it would make a solid addition.

I'm terribly sorry. Who is Francis and why do we care?

I thought Dave and Busters was a sports bar chain?

To a point. If the media needs a sacrificial lamb to distract people from the shit that they should care about it doesn't matter how much money you have you're ass is going down.

I know the one you're talking about but I also don't know it's name. I would have my brother drive while I dual wielded the guns.

You're damn right! Every shooter should have exactly the same shooting mechanics! Any variation is in willful defiance to established norms and should be seen as a design fault not a design choice!

Americans have 2 courts. Judicial and 24 hour news court. Once 24 hour news court says you murdered some one you're guilty. It matters now what a jury of our peers says because CNN, FOX, MSNBC, HLN and even World News tonight with Diane Sawyer all told the world what you "did" so you're not guilty of it.