The refs won the game.
The refs won the game.
When I worked at a liquor store we had the "mini" bottles of these that we'd put by the cash registers for an impulse buy. I had to remove them when even the 85 year old woman asked why I had a box of penises on my counter.
I'm not a fan of criminals in any profession, personally.
It really comes down to stuff like flexyourrights.org, Don't answer police questions, be polite, yet firm, and follow through on your court dates;
Are you seriously defending an officer's abuse of power? You don't abuse your power like that just because someone is (understandably) upset about you falsely accusing them of illegal activity.
I heard this story earlier today on NPR. They reported that the device was off, but activated when she looked up at the police…
"During the hearing, it came to light that Highway Patrol Officer Keith Odle hadn't planned to issue a ticket to Abadie for wearing Google Glass—until she got a little bit feisty."
Freakin' cops, man. Oh yeah, nothing illegal was happening, but I decided to find a reason when she started getting lippy.
Its like 85 in LA, no fog, and better burritos
I moved from the bay area to San Diego last summer and it is even better here. It feels like summer, almost.
77F across the bay.
I feel like anyone dumb enough to record video in portrait mode won't be downloading this app. You have to realize you have a problem before you can look for a solution to it.
It seems like a privacy thing, even though a) its a really crappy blur where we can still make out exactly who this guy is from the pictures, and b) they miss the blur on one shot, making the whole effort null.
Xenophobic? No. That's dedicated to all the dumbasses who put their health in the hands of non-scientific stupidity, regardless of their country, race, and religion.
Why did they do such a crap job blurring the victim's eyes? Wasn't there anything about his condition too shocking for television? I thought the recreation was ridiculous, but you can say the same for a animation 3d or 2d.
no. you don't understand. this goes all the way to the top. they ARE the utility companies.
I find it odd that a company would want to collect data on the heating and cooling preferences of ordinary people unless they plan to turn these studies over to the utility companies so they can adjust their pricing relative to our need and use. Or for the data to be turned over to government forces wanting to tax us…
Introducing the NEST 3!
I think Leslie's face was enough to sum it up, dat sweater tho.