RB_XXV_Z
RB_XXV_Z
RB_XXV_Z

Because it's like a unicorn married a horse, amirite?

Is this a sponsored post? LOL. BMS has no trouble piggy-backing without causing issues and all for a whopping $450. Add a nice exhaust and intake for $3k...boom just saved yourself seven grand.

Gulf livery because racecar.

Never was a mustang fan..but this shit looks sick

The car in the video does not look like a Toyota Tercel. It looks like a JDM Toyota like A Mark II.

He literally could say "I woulda got away with it too, if it weren't for those pesky teenagers!" like a Scooby Doo villain.

When there's been drive bys and people walking the streets with shotguns in ski masks, I say they can pretty much enforce the law the way they deem necessary.

I love the last paragraph of the article:

With a 290 mph Hennessey F5 coming out, a new Bugatti being planned and a host of other uber expensive hypercars, the Caparo stands out from the crowd with its ridiculously low weight. I personally subscribe to the less is more philosophy. Any car that weighs only 1,000 pounds has to be good, even with say 200 hp.

The "T1 Evolution" should just be a package deal where you buy a T1 and get an Evo thrown in so you can actually go places quickly after your T1 breaks/spins into a hedge/burns to the ground.

I would prefer this...

How dare you post this musical abortion - Darius Rucker should never be allowed near a microphone again.

At first I was surprised. Then I realized something very important: these are cobalt owners.

The best I can do within my short break

I'm an engineer for a large automaker. We have reps from the legal department tell us this stuff all the time. The real problem is the legal system in the US and fear of litigation that prevents us from saying these things.

As a lawyer I may have a different perspective, but I don't see anything wrong with this. GM employees aren't being prevented from talking frankly about the problem, they are just being encouraged to talk about the problem without making a qualitative judgment. It's perfectly rational to discourage a discussion that

I dont think thats exactly the point they are trying to convey if anything they want a specific report of the problem not just some vague generalization. I see where they could be coming from, ya know in order to solve an issue they have to know exactly what that issue is not just oh you know this vehicle is a

Suppressors is the most accurate and preferred term. Silencers is kind of some TV bullshit.

Supressors. Only non-shooters call them "silencers".

I believe my point still stands.