No, that’s definitely the answer with fewer assumptions. To believe otherwise is to believe that within the radius of one block, there was a group with a gun-like object that robbed someone and another group with a gun-like object that did not. Definitely possible, but not more simple an answer than him being the…
PunditGuy
PunditGuy
Sorry, I didn’t mean to imply otherwise. We know, now, that they were a group with a member with a weapon. Occam’s Razor still applies.
This was obviously a case of mistaken identity. They just happened to be a group and one of them just happened to have something that looked like a gun a block away from where someone was robbed by a group in which one person brandished a gun. The universe is cruel that way.
Sorry. I’ll pick something a lot more complicated. Like divorce itself.
Is there a complication threshold? I’m asking because as someone in an interfaith, interracial relationship, I understand that dissolution could be complicated if children want to identify with the race or religion of the non-custodial parent.
Things might get complicated, so we better just ban the whole thing. Sound reasoning, that.
From the linked article:
https://translate.google.com/#auto/en/flm%2…%20Ju%20lutem%20bejini%20share%20kesaj%20faqe%2C%20kjo%20eshte%20e%20vetmja%20faqe...%20dhe%20ne%20fb%20nuk%20ekzistoj%20si%20person%20por%20vetem%20kjo%20faqe.%20Flm!*
Same UHD boat. In addition to Deadpool I’ve got The Martian and Star Trek (2009) on UHD as well, and I’ve been waiting for the Neo...er, Pro... to be my player. Instead, I bought an Xbox One S today.
I can see how forgetting your pants could be anxiety-inducing.
/looks at preview picture
I think Gateway could make an interesting mix of first-person exploration game with a 4x rts backbone — but we’d have to find a way to keep players from dying so danged much.
Why do the words “voter fraud” not appear above?
Rob one person, go to jail. Rob 1,000 with some banking scheme and you can go home and think about what you’ve done?
It is irrational to expect a stranger to risk death to save a pet. If you are excusing that irrationality behind trauma, so be it. It’s still irrational.
Not feeling particularly miserable, thanks.
May your hyperbole always be as entertainingly overwrought.
Regardless of circumstance, I’m still going to believe that a pet is not worth risking someone else’s life over.
>“No, she better not be,” the woman said, giving Phung no real choice but to plunge back down and try again.<